Branch :
| Author | Commit | Date | CI | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01eeb5f6 | 2007-09-15 10:14:32 | zap all quotes in COMMENT/PERMIT_* | ||
| 056bf5d7 | 2004-11-21 12:50:32 | Mark all system libs in WANTLIB, result of running newlib-depends-check | ||
| bc0bf07f | 2003-06-04 22:16:22 | - more consistency for permit values - adjust some permit lines per discussion on ports@ ok naddy@ | ||
| aed7b6d5 | 2003-05-24 02:40:42 | lzo -- # GPL lzop -- # GNU GPL -> # GPL macutil -- sync w/# None style nulib -- # Restrictive rar -- # Restrictive ucl -- # GPL unace -- # Copyrighted but freely distributable. That's all the author states. Is this acceptable as a license? -- Drop MAINTAINER per his request unarj -- # Restrictive PERMIT_*_CDROM=No "If you wish to distribute a modified version of UNARJ you MUST indicate that it is a modified version both in the program and source code." unrar -- # Restrictive unzip -- # Conditional It is freely re-distributable with conditions which we meet. This could use another pair of eyes to confirm. zip -- # Conditional Same thing as unzip. zoo -- # Conditional Different author/license but same idea as zip/unzip. | ||
| 3101b763 | 2002-12-23 00:37:49 | Remove Angelos from maintainer per his request | ||
| 4eeb7add | 2002-03-21 20:35:40 | bump NEED_VERSION for distinfo | ||
| e18d8899 | 2001-10-04 22:26:48 | Note existing regression tests for archivers. No need to update NEED_VERSION, this won't break anything otherwise. | ||
| 1953a9ae | 2001-04-20 17:35:31 | bump NEED_VERSION | ||
| 3ae2d1aa | 2001-03-29 15:01:53 | - integrate COMMENT - bump NEED_VERSION | ||
| aa4a7733 | 2000-10-22 14:02:46 | Complete a few MAINTAINER names. |