Branch :
| Author | Commit | Date | CI | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e2a36dd1 | 2010-12-22 14:58:53 | Bugfix update to pjsua-1.8.10 | ||
| 811d94d9 | 2010-11-20 19:56:47 | new depends | ||
| 5ef9a9bf | 2010-11-08 10:56:02 | We now have sched_get_priority_(mix|max) OK landry@, jasper@ | ||
| 981a30b3 | 2010-10-22 14:36:12 | Bugfix update to pjsua-1.8.5 | ||
| 7ee93fae | 2010-09-24 10:46:47 | Better comments (aligned with upstream). No functional changes, no bump | ||
| fc775a9d | 2010-09-24 07:52:37 | After discussion with fgsch@ and others, It's now clear that I was wrong and 31 IS the correct value: shame on me... "You need to revive the patch that was before 1.7" fgsch@ | ||
| e532df18 | 2010-09-16 07:59:23 | Bugfix update to pjsua-1.8 | ||
| 482e8f74 | 2010-09-14 07:37:19 | Update to pjsua-1.7 OK sthen@ | ||
| 43386242 | 2010-07-27 09:27:23 | Switch to new-style REVISION/LIB_DEPENDS/WANTLIB OK sthen@ | ||
| 086ecd19 | 2010-05-14 10:16:32 | FreeBSD *does* have sched_get_priority_{min,max}, so my previous patch was wrong OK sthen@ |