|
d0bbfdbf
|
2022-12-01T16:07:03
|
|
Clang-Tidy fixes (#6725)
(cherry picked from commit 3c501b963dd8f0605a6ce7978882df39ba76f9cd)
|
|
b8d85c69
|
2022-11-30T12:51:59
|
|
Update for SDL3 coding style (#6717)
I updated .clang-format and ran clang-format 14 over the src and test directories to standardize the code base.
In general I let clang-format have it's way, and added markup to prevent formatting of code that would break or be completely unreadable if formatted.
The script I ran for the src directory is added as build-scripts/clang-format-src.sh
This fixes:
#6592
#6593
#6594
(cherry picked from commit 5750bcb174300011b91d1de20edb288fcca70f8c)
|
|
fb0ce375
|
2022-11-27T17:38:43
|
|
Cleanup add brace (#6545)
* Add braces after if conditions
* More add braces after if conditions
* Add braces after while() conditions
* Fix compilation because of macro being modified
* Add braces to for loop
* Add braces after if/goto
* Move comments up
* Remove extra () in the 'return ...;' statements
* More remove extra () in the 'return ...;' statements
* More remove extra () in the 'return ...;' statements after merge
* Fix inconsistent patterns are xxx == NULL vs !xxx
* More "{}" for "if() break;" and "if() continue;"
* More "{}" after if() short statement
* More "{}" after "if () return;" statement
* More fix inconsistent patterns are xxx == NULL vs !xxx
* Revert some modificaion on SDL_RLEaccel.c
* SDL_RLEaccel: no short statement
* Cleanup 'if' where the bracket is in a new line
* Cleanup 'while' where the bracket is in a new line
* Cleanup 'for' where the bracket is in a new line
* Cleanup 'else' where the bracket is in a new line
(cherry picked from commit 6a2200823c66e53bd3cda4a25f0206b834392652 to reduce conflicts merging between SDL2 and SDL3)
|
|
9f8b68a2
|
2022-11-11T10:24:17
|
|
Fixed building without linux/input.h
https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/6169
|
|
120c76c8
|
2022-01-03T09:40:00
|
|
Updated copyright for 2022
|
|
373216ae
|
2021-10-07T18:14:16
|
|
Added support for touchpads in the Linux evdev code (thanks Francisco!)
|
|
9130f7c3
|
2021-01-02T10:25:38
|
|
Updated copyright for 2021
|
|
040bd7a9
|
2020-12-28T00:55:28
|
|
Fix udev not detecting ID_INPUT_KEY devices when udev is not running
https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5308
The udev code labels devices that are found by this code with
ID_INPUT_KEY which in turn gets used by SDL to label the devices as
SDL_UDEV_DEVICE_KEYBOARD.
This was missing for the code path when udev is not running and as such
devices such as the power button of a phone was not detected as keyboard
input and no devices were emitted.
|
|
aae53d59
|
2020-11-11T19:15:09
|
|
evdev: Detect whether input devices are accelerometers
Anything with X, Y and Z axes but no buttons is probably an
accelerometer (this is the assumption made in udev).
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
|
|
fdd945f2
|
2020-11-11T19:14:52
|
|
joystick: Use a better heuristic to guess what is a joystick
Previously we only checked for at least one button or key and at least
the X and Y absolute axes, but this has both false positives and false
negatives.
Graphics tablets, trackpads and touchscreens all have buttons and
absolute X and Y axes, but we don't want to detect those as joysticks.
On normal Linux systems ordinary users do not have access to these
device nodes, but members of the 'input' group do.
Conversely, some game controllers only have digital buttons and no
analogue axes (the Nintendo Wiimote is an example), and some have axes
and no buttons (steering wheels or flight simulator rudders might not
have buttons).
Use the more elaborate heuristic factored out from SDL's udev code path
to handle these cases.
In an ideal world we could use exactly the same heuristic as udev's
input_id builtin, but that isn't under a suitable license for inclusion
in SDL, so we have to use a parallel implementation of something
vaguely similar.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
|
|
8db3171b
|
2020-11-11T19:14:34
|
|
udev: Factor out SDL_EVDEV_GuessDeviceClass
This works on capability bitfields that can either come from udev or
from ioctls, so it is equally applicable to both udev and non-udev
input device detection.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
|