Branch :
| Author | Commit | Date | CI | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30316177 | 2016-06-28 10:37:24 | [#372] check for errno.h | ||
| 9fde5189 | 2016-02-15 00:12:54 | http: lingering close (like nginx have) for entity-too-large By lingering close I mean something what nginx have for this name, by this term I mean that we need to read all the body even if it's size greater then `max_body_size`, otherwise browsers on win32 (including chrome) failed read the http status - entity-too-large (while on linux chrome for instance are good), and also this includes badly written http clients. Refs: #321 v2: do this only under EVHTTP_SERVER_LINGERING_CLOSE | ||
| 680742e1 | 2016-02-10 14:43:18 | http: read server response even after server closed the connection Otherwise if we will try to write more data than server can accept (see `evhttp_set_max_body_size()` for libevent server) we will get `EPIPE` and will not try to read server's response which must contain 400 error for now (which is not strictly correct though, it must 413). ``` $ strace regress --no-fork http/data_length_constraints ... connect(10, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(43988), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in progress) ... writev(10, [{"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: somehost\r"..., 60}, {"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"..., 16324}], 2) = 16384 epoll_wait(5, [{EPOLLOUT, {u32=10, u64=10}}, {EPOLLIN, {u32=11, u64=11}}], 32, 50000) = 2 writev(10, [{"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"..., 16384}], 1) = 16384 ioctl(11, FIONREAD, [32768]) = 0 readv(11, [{"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: somehost\r"..., 4096}], 1) = 4096 epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 11, 0x7fff09d41e50) = 0 epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 11, {EPOLLOUT, {u32=11, u64=11}}) = 0 epoll_wait(5, [{EPOLLOUT, {u32=10, u64=10}}, {EPOLLOUT, {u32=11, u64=11}}], 32, 50000) = 2 writev(10, [{"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"..., 16384}], 1) = 16384 writev(11, [{"HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request\r\nConten"..., 129}, {"<HTML><HEAD>\n<TITLE>400 Bad Requ"..., 94}], 2) = 223 epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 11, 0x7fff09d42080) = 0 shutdown(11, SHUT_WR) = 0 close(11) = 0 epoll_wait(5, [{EPOLLOUT|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP, {u32=10, u64=10}}], 32, 50000) = 1 writev(10, [{"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"..., 16384}], 1) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe) --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=13954, si_uid=1000} --- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 10, 0x7fff09d42010) = 0 shutdown(10, SHUT_WR) = -1 ENOTCONN (Transport endpoint is not connected) close(10) = 0 write(1, "\n FAIL ../test/regress_http.c:3"..., 37 ``` Careful reader can ask why it send error even when it didn't read `evcon->max_body_size`, and the answer will be checks for `evcon->max_body_size against `Content-Length` header, which contains ~8MB (-2 bytes). And also if we will not drain the output buffer than we will send buffer that we didn't send in previous request and instead of sending method via `evhttp_make_header()`. Fixes: http/data_length_constraints Refs: #321 v2: do this only under EVHTTP_CON_READ_ON_WRITE_ERROR flag | ||
| 4dc09795 | 2016-02-15 02:59:40 | http: fix conflicts EVHTTP_CON_AUTOFREE and EVHTTP_CON_REUSE_CONNECTED_ADDR And we can't make them continuous, since the latest is a public API, and otherwise we will break binary compatibility. Also extra check for EVHTTP_CON_PUBLIC_FLAGS_END, in case somebody forgot about this (implementer I mean). Refs: #182 | ||
| bb6b53d0 | 2016-01-12 01:35:46 | visibility: align it to make it more readable | ||
| a264da86 | 2015-12-20 00:57:50 | Revert "The Windows socket type is defined as SOCKET." | ||
| c9e6c3d7 | 2015-12-16 11:17:36 | The Windows socket type is defined as SOCKET. Under the hood it's an unsigned rather than a signed type and whilst C compilers are largely happy with this C++ compilers tend to be fussy about class function signatures which makes C++ usage of libevent problematic. | ||
| 575ff678 | 2015-10-30 01:34:40 | buffer_compat: fix comment -- we have EVBUFFER_EOL_ANY not EOL_STYLE_ANY | ||
| 714fc705 | 2015-09-10 11:46:17 | http: export evhttp_connection_set_family() Fixes #176 | ||
| fd36647a | 2015-08-25 15:24:39 | Don't use BSD u_* types. These types are not part of POSIX. As we only use them in a small number of places, we'd better replace them by C standard types. This makes a larger part of the code build for CloudABI. |