src/types.c


Log

Author Commit Date CI Message
Dominik Vogt 6e8a4460 2014-09-20T06:21:19 2014-07-22 Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> * src/types.c (FFI_TYPEDEF, FFI_NONCONST_TYPEDEF): Merge the macros by adding another argument that controls whether the result is const or not (FFI_LDBL_CONST): Temporary macro to reduce ifdef confusion * src/prep_cif.c (ffi_prep_cif_core): Replace list of systems with new macro FFI_TARGET_SPECIFIC_STACK_SPACE_ALLOCATION * src/pa/ffitarget.h (FFI_TARGET_SPECIFIC_STACK_SPACE_ALLOCATION): Define. * src/s390/ffitarget.h (FFI_TARGET_SPECIFIC_STACK_SPACE_ALLOCATION): Define. * src/x86/ffitarget.h (FFI_TARGET_SPECIFIC_STACK_SPACE_ALLOCATION): Define. 2014-07-22 Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> * doc/libffi.texi (Primitive Types): Document ffi_type_complex_float, ffi_type_complex_double and ffi_type_complex_longdouble (Complex Types): New subsection. (Complex Type Example): Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_align_complex_double.c: New FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX test. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_align_complex_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_align_complex_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_struct_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_struct_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_struct_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_va_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_va_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_complex_va_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_defs_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_defs_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_defs_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/complex_int.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/many_complex_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/many_complex_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/many_complex_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex1_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex1_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex1_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex2_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex2_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex2_longdouble.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex_double.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex_float.c: Ditto. * testsuite/libffi.call/return_complex_longdouble.c: Ditto. * src/raw_api.c (ffi_raw_to_ptrarray): Handle FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX (ffi_ptrarray_to_raw): Ditto. * src/prep_cif.c (ffi_prep_cif_core): Abort if FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX is not implemented in libffi for the target. * src/java_raw_api.c (ffi_java_raw_size): FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX not supported yet (abort). (ffi_java_raw_to_ptrarray): Ditto. (ffi_java_rvalue_to_raw): Ditto. (ffi_java_raw_to_rvalue): Ditto. * src/debug.c (ffi_type_test): Add debug tests for complex types. * include/ffi.h.in (FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX): Add new FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX. (FFI_TYPE_LAST): Bump. (ffi_type_complex_float): Add new ffi_type_.... (ffi_type_complex_double): Ditto. (ffi_type_complex_longdouble): Ditto. 2014-07-22 Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> * src/s390/ffitarget.h (FFI_TARGET_HAS_COMPLEX_TYPE): Define to provide FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX support. * src/s390/ffi.c (ffi_check_struct_type): Implement FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX (ffi_prep_args): Ditto. (ffi_prep_cif_machdep): Ditto. (ffi_closure_helper_SYSV): Ditto.
Alan Modra ab79d6e2 2013-11-21T06:12:35 This separates the 32-bit sysv/linux/bsd code from the 64-bit linux code, and makes it possible to link code compiled with different options to those used to compile libffi. For example, a -mlong-double-128 libffi can be used with -mlong-double-64 code. Using the return value area as a place to pass parameters wasn't such a good idea, causing a failure of cls_ulonglong.c. I didn't see this when running the mainline gcc libffi testsuite because that version of the test is inferior to the upstreamm libffi test. Using NUM_FPR_ARG_REGISTERS rather than NUM_FPR_ARG_REGISTERS64 meant that a parameter save area could be allocated before it was strictly necessary. Wrong but harmless. Found when splitting apart ffi.c into 32-bit and 64-bit support.
Alan Modra ac753688 2013-11-21T06:12:35 This separates the 32-bit sysv/linux/bsd code from the 64-bit linux code, and makes it possible to link code compiled with different options to those used to compile libffi. For example, a -mlong-double-128 libffi can be used with -mlong-double-64 code. Using the return value area as a place to pass parameters wasn't such a good idea, causing a failure of cls_ulonglong.c. I didn't see this when running the mainline gcc libffi testsuite because that version of the test is inferior to the upstreamm libffi test. Using NUM_FPR_ARG_REGISTERS rather than NUM_FPR_ARG_REGISTERS64 meant that a parameter save area could be allocated before it was strictly necessary. Wrong but harmless. Found when splitting apart ffi.c into 32-bit and 64-bit support.
Anthony Green c6dddbd0 2009-10-04T08:11:33 Initial commit