|
6d02718d
|
2024-09-14T12:42:12
|
|
JNI: Guard against int. overflow w/ ICC profiles
|
|
|
9b01f5a0
|
2024-09-14T11:56:14
|
|
TJ: Add func/method for computing xformed buf size
|
|
|
6f1fe2d1
|
2024-09-09T10:52:18
|
|
turbojpeg-jni.c: Fix int. conv. warnings w/ VC++
|
|
|
a2728582
|
2024-09-03T07:54:17
|
|
TurboJPEG: ICC profile support
|
|
|
c519d7b6
|
2024-09-05T11:10:44
|
|
Don't ignore JPEG buf size with TJPARAM_NOREALLOC
Since the introduction of TJFLAG_NOREALLOC in libjpeg-turbo 1.2.x, the
TurboJPEG C API documentation has (confusingly) stated that:
- if the JPEG buffer pointer points to a pre-allocated buffer, then the
JPEG buffer size must be specified, and
- the JPEG buffer size should be specified if the JPEG buffer is
pre-allocated to an arbitrary size.
The documentation never explicitly stated that the JPEG buffer size
should be specified if the JPEG buffer is pre-allocated to a worst-case
size, but since focus does not imply exclusion, it also never explicitly
stated the reverse. Furthermore, the documentation never stated that
this was contingent upon TJPARAM_NOREALLOC/TJFLAG_NOREALLOC. However,
effectively the compression and lossless transformation functions
ignored the JPEG buffer size(s) passed to them, and assumed that the
JPEG buffer(s) had been allocated to a worst-case size, if
TJPARAM_NOREALLOC/TJFLAG_NOREALLOC was set. This behavior was an
accidental and undocumented throwback to libjpeg-turbo 1.1.x, in which
the tjCompress() function provided no way to specify the JPEG buffer
size. It was always a bad idea for applications to rely upon that
behavior (although our own TJBench application unfortunately did.)
However, if such applications exist in the wild, the new behavior would
constitute a breaking change, so it has been introduced only into
libjpeg-turbo 3.1.x and only into TurboJPEG 3 API functions. The
previous behavior has been retained when calling functions from the
TurboJPEG 2.1.x API and prior versions.
Did I mention that APIs are hard?
|
|
|
5f05c75a
|
2024-09-06T19:55:20
|
|
Merge branch 'main' into dev
|
|
|
8db41dad
|
2024-09-05T15:15:08
|
|
Merge branch 'main' into dev
|
|
|
64567381
|
2024-08-31T17:31:02
|
|
Merge branch 'main' into dev
|
|
|
2858783d
|
2024-08-28T18:16:18
|
|
JNI: Set srcX, srcY = 0 in loadSourceImage()
(oversight from 79b8d65f0f86af77afc5979ecc104b1fbc97c82d)
|
|
|
acbb4937
|
2024-08-22T18:31:41
|
|
JNI: Fix Windows CI build failure
(introduced by previous commit)
jint and int are technically the same thing, but certain compilers are a
bit pedantic.
|
|
|
79b8d65f
|
2024-08-22T13:50:32
|
|
Java: Add official packed-pixel image I/O methods
|
|
|
a98bc9a5
|
2024-08-22T17:14:37
|
|
Merge branch 'main' into dev
|
|
|
6ec8e41f
|
2024-06-13T11:52:13
|
|
Handle lossless JPEG images w/2-15 bits per sample
Closes #768
Closes #769
|
|
|
e69dd40c
|
2024-01-23T13:26:41
|
|
Reorganize source to make things easier to find
- Move all libjpeg documentation, except for README.ijg, into the doc/
subdirectory.
- Move the TurboJPEG C API documentation from doc/html/ into
doc/turbojpeg/.
- Move all C source code and headers into a src/ subdirectory.
- Move turbojpeg-jni.c into the java/ subdirectory.
Referring to #226, there is no ideal solution to this problem. A
semantically ideal solution would have involved placing all source code,
including the SIMD and Java source code, under src/ (or perhaps placing
C library source code under lib/ and C test program source code under
test/), all header files under include/, and all documentation under
doc/. However:
- To me it makes more sense to have separate top-level directories for
each language, since the SIMD extensions and the Java API are
technically optional features. src/ now contains only the code that
is relevant to the core C API libraries and associated programs.
- I didn't want to bury the java/ and simd/ directories or add a level
of depth to them, since both directories already contain source code
that is 3-4 levels deep.
- I would prefer not to separate the header files from the C source
code, because:
1. It would be disruptive. libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo have
historically placed C source code and headers in the same
directory, and people who are familiar with both projects (self
included) are used to looking for the headers in the same directory
as the C source code.
2. In terms of how the headers are used internally in libjpeg-turbo,
the distinction between public and private headers is a bit fuzzy.
- It didn't make sense to separate the test source code from the library
source code, since there is not a clear distinction in some cases.
(For instance, the IJG image I/O functions are used by cjpeg and djpeg
as well as by the TurboJPEG API.)
This solution is minimally disruptive, since it keeps all C source code
and headers together and keeps java/ and simd/ as top-level directories.
It is a bit awkward, because java/ and simd/ technically contain source
code, even though they are not under src/. However, other solutions
would have been more awkward for different reasons.
Closes #226
|