state: fix bad EFFECTIVE check in *_is_active() This is a regression introduced in ed78fbcb30888cbfc6cd00. XKB_STATE_EFFECTIVE is just a OR of the other states, so using & here is completely wrong. So test/state shows for example: dumping state for LCtrl down: group English (US) (0): effective depressed latched locked mod Control (2): depressed latched locked dumping state for LCtrl + RAlt down: group English (US) (0): effective depressed latched locked mod Control (2): depressed latched locked mod Mod1 (3): depressed latched locked dumping state for RAlt down: group English (US) (0): effective depressed latched locked mod Mod1 (3): depressed latched locked dumping state for Caps Lock: group English (US) (0): effective depressed latched locked mod Lock (1): depressed latched locked led Caps Lock (0): active dumping state for Alt-Shift-+ group English (US) (0): effective depressed latched locked mod Shift (0): depressed latched locked mod Mod1 (3): depressed latched locked which is bogus. Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
diff --git a/src/state.c b/src/state.c
index e186ece..1fad36f 100644
--- a/src/state.c
+++ b/src/state.c
@@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ xkb_state_mod_index_is_active(struct xkb_state *state,
if (idx >= xkb_keymap_num_mods(state->keymap))
return -1;
- if (type & XKB_STATE_EFFECTIVE)
+ if (type == XKB_STATE_EFFECTIVE)
return !!(state->mods & (1 << idx));
if (type & XKB_STATE_DEPRESSED)
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ xkb_state_layout_index_is_active(struct xkb_state *state,
return -1;
/* Can only have one effective group. */
- if (type & XKB_STATE_EFFECTIVE)
+ if (type == XKB_STATE_EFFECTIVE)
return state->group == idx;
if (type & XKB_STATE_DEPRESSED)
diff --git a/test/state.c b/test/state.c
index 3da4c99..8cd11e0 100644
--- a/test/state.c
+++ b/test/state.c
@@ -149,6 +149,11 @@ test_update_key(struct xkb_keymap *keymap)
XKB_MOD_NAME_CTRL,
XKB_MOD_NAME_ALT,
NULL) > 0);
+ assert(xkb_state_mod_names_are_active(state, XKB_STATE_LATCHED,
+ XKB_STATE_MATCH_ANY,
+ XKB_MOD_NAME_CTRL,
+ XKB_MOD_NAME_ALT,
+ NULL) == 0);
/* none down */
xkb_state_update_key(state, KEY_RIGHTALT + EVDEV_OFFSET, XKB_KEY_UP);
@@ -157,10 +162,14 @@ test_update_key(struct xkb_keymap *keymap)
/* Caps locked */
xkb_state_update_key(state, KEY_CAPSLOCK + EVDEV_OFFSET, XKB_KEY_DOWN);
+ assert(xkb_state_mod_name_is_active(state, XKB_MOD_NAME_CAPS,
+ XKB_STATE_DEPRESSED) > 0);
xkb_state_update_key(state, KEY_CAPSLOCK + EVDEV_OFFSET, XKB_KEY_UP);
fprintf(stderr, "dumping state for Caps Lock:\n");
print_state(state);
assert(xkb_state_mod_name_is_active(state, XKB_MOD_NAME_CAPS,
+ XKB_STATE_DEPRESSED) == 0);
+ assert(xkb_state_mod_name_is_active(state, XKB_MOD_NAME_CAPS,
XKB_STATE_LOCKED) > 0);
assert(xkb_state_led_name_is_active(state, XKB_LED_NAME_CAPS) > 0);
num_syms = xkb_state_key_get_syms(state, KEY_Q + EVDEV_OFFSET, &syms);