Commit 531514048a1dbfabe9ae983dab49bb4239589469

Michael Schmidt 2021-05-01T18:01:07

Tests: Exhaustive pattern tests (#2688)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
diff --git a/components/prism-erb.js b/components/prism-erb.js
index 132f4f5..989d56f 100644
--- a/components/prism-erb.js
+++ b/components/prism-erb.js
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 	});
 
 	Prism.hooks.add('before-tokenize', function (env) {
-		var erbPattern = /<%=?(?:[^\r\n]|[\r\n](?!=begin)|[\r\n]=begin\s[\s\S]*?^=end)+?%>/gm;
+		var erbPattern = /<%=?(?:[^\r\n]|[\r\n](?!=begin)|[\r\n]=begin\s(?:[^\r\n]|[\r\n](?!=end))*[\r\n]=end)+?%>/gm;
 		Prism.languages['markup-templating'].buildPlaceholders(env, 'erb', erbPattern);
 	});
 
diff --git a/components/prism-erb.min.js b/components/prism-erb.min.js
index 25d3c27..a9ca5e4 100644
--- a/components/prism-erb.min.js
+++ b/components/prism-erb.min.js
@@ -1 +1 @@
-!function(n){n.languages.erb=n.languages.extend("ruby",{}),n.languages.insertBefore("erb","comment",{delimiter:{pattern:/^<%=?|%>$/,alias:"punctuation"}}),n.hooks.add("before-tokenize",function(e){n.languages["markup-templating"].buildPlaceholders(e,"erb",/<%=?(?:[^\r\n]|[\r\n](?!=begin)|[\r\n]=begin\s[\s\S]*?^=end)+?%>/gm)}),n.hooks.add("after-tokenize",function(e){n.languages["markup-templating"].tokenizePlaceholders(e,"erb")})}(Prism);
\ No newline at end of file
+!function(n){n.languages.erb=n.languages.extend("ruby",{}),n.languages.insertBefore("erb","comment",{delimiter:{pattern:/^<%=?|%>$/,alias:"punctuation"}}),n.hooks.add("before-tokenize",function(e){n.languages["markup-templating"].buildPlaceholders(e,"erb",/<%=?(?:[^\r\n]|[\r\n](?!=begin)|[\r\n]=begin\s(?:[^\r\n]|[\r\n](?!=end))*[\r\n]=end)+?%>/gm)}),n.hooks.add("after-tokenize",function(e){n.languages["markup-templating"].tokenizePlaceholders(e,"erb")})}(Prism);
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/tests/pattern-tests.js b/tests/pattern-tests.js
index bf1ac4f..90535e4 100644
--- a/tests/pattern-tests.js
+++ b/tests/pattern-tests.js
@@ -1,26 +1,41 @@
+// @ts-check
 'use strict';
 
 const { assert } = require('chai');
 const PrismLoader = require('./helper/prism-loader');
+const TestDiscovery = require('./helper/test-discovery');
+const TestCase = require('./helper/test-case');
 const { BFS, parseRegex } = require('./helper/util');
 const { languages } = require('../components.json');
 const { visitRegExpAST } = require('regexpp');
 const { transform, combineTransformers, JS, Words, NFA, Transformers } = require('refa');
 const scslre = require('scslre');
+const path = require('path');
 
 /**
- * A set of all safe (non-exponentially backtracking) RegExp literals (string).
+ * A map from language id to a list of code snippets in that language.
  *
- * @type {Set<string>}
+ * @type {Map<string, string[]>}
  */
-const expoSafeRegexes = new Set();
+const testSnippets = new Map();
+const testSuite = TestDiscovery.loadAllTests(__dirname + '/languages');
+for (const languageIdentifier in testSuite) {
+	const lang = TestCase.parseLanguageNames(languageIdentifier).mainLanguage;
+	let snippets = testSnippets.get(lang);
+	if (snippets === undefined) {
+		snippets = [];
+		testSnippets.set(lang, snippets);
+	}
+
+	for (const file of testSuite[languageIdentifier]) {
+		if (path.extname(file) === '.test') {
+			snippets.push(TestCase.parseTestCaseFile(file).code);
+		} else {
+			snippets.push(...Object.keys(require(file)));
+		}
+	}
+}
 
-/**
- * A set of all safe (non-polynomially backtracking) RegExp literals (string).
- *
- * @type {Set<string>}
- */
-const polySafeRegexes = new Set();
 
 for (const lang in languages) {
 	if (lang === 'meta') {
@@ -29,19 +44,9 @@ for (const lang in languages) {
 
 	describe(`Patterns of '${lang}'`, function () {
 		const Prism = PrismLoader.createInstance(lang);
-		testPatterns(Prism);
+		testPatterns(Prism, lang);
 	});
 
-	function toArray(value) {
-		if (Array.isArray(value)) {
-			return value;
-		} else if (value != null) {
-			return [value];
-		} else {
-			return [];
-		}
-	}
-
 	let optional = toArray(languages[lang].optional);
 	let modify = toArray(languages[lang].modify);
 
@@ -56,7 +61,7 @@ for (const lang in languages) {
 
 		describe(name, function () {
 			const Prism = PrismLoader.createInstance([...optional, ...modify, lang]);
-			testPatterns(Prism);
+			testPatterns(Prism, lang);
 		});
 	}
 }
@@ -65,6 +70,7 @@ for (const lang in languages) {
  * Tests all patterns in the given Prism instance.
  *
  * @param {any} Prism
+ * @param {string} mainLanguage
  *
  * @typedef {import("./helper/util").LiteralAST} LiteralAST
  * @typedef {import("regexpp/ast").CapturingGroup} CapturingGroup
@@ -73,7 +79,40 @@ for (const lang in languages) {
  * @typedef {import("regexpp/ast").LookaroundAssertion} LookaroundAssertion
  * @typedef {import("regexpp/ast").Pattern} Pattern
  */
-function testPatterns(Prism) {
+function testPatterns(Prism, mainLanguage) {
+
+	/**
+	 * Returns a list of relevant languages in the Prism instance.
+	 *
+	 * The list does not included readonly dependencies and aliases.
+	 *
+	 * @returns {string[]}
+	 */
+	function getRelevantLanguages() {
+		return [mainLanguage, ...toArray(languages[mainLanguage].modify)]
+			.filter(lang => lang in Prism.languages);
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * @param {string} root
+	 * @param {Parameters<Parameters<typeof BFS>[1]>[0]} path
+	 * @returns {string}
+	 */
+	function BFSPathToString(root, path) {
+		let pathStr = root;
+		for (const { key } of path) {
+			if (!key) {
+				// do nothing
+			} else if (/^\d+$/.test(key)) {
+				pathStr += `[${key}]`;
+			} else if (/^[a-z]\w*$/i.test(key)) {
+				pathStr += `.${key}`;
+			} else {
+				pathStr += `[${JSON.stringify(key)}]`;
+			}
+		}
+		return pathStr;
+	}
 
 	/**
 	 * Invokes the given function on every pattern in `Prism.languages`.
@@ -94,49 +133,73 @@ function testPatterns(Prism) {
 	 * @property {(message: string) => void} reportError
 	 */
 	function forEachPattern(callback) {
+		const visited = new Set();
 		const errors = [];
 
-		BFS(Prism.languages, path => {
-			const { key, value } = path[path.length - 1];
-
-			let tokenPath = 'Prism.languages';
-			for (const { key } of path) {
-				if (!key) {
-					// do nothing
-				} else if (/^\d+$/.test(key)) {
-					tokenPath += `[${key}]`;
-				} else if (/^[a-z]\w*$/i.test(key)) {
-					tokenPath += `.${key}`;
-				} else {
-					tokenPath += `[${JSON.stringify(key)}]`;
-				}
+		/**
+		 * @param {object} root
+		 * @param {string} rootStr
+		 */
+		function traverse(root, rootStr) {
+			if (visited.has(root)) {
+				return;
 			}
+			visited.add(root);
 
-			if (Object.prototype.toString.call(value) == '[object RegExp]') {
-				try {
-					let ast;
+			BFS(root, path => {
+				const { key, value } = path[path.length - 1];
+				visited.add(value);
+
+				const tokenPath = BFSPathToString(rootStr, path);
+
+				if (Object.prototype.toString.call(value) == '[object RegExp]') {
 					try {
-						ast = parseRegex(value);
+						let ast;
+						try {
+							ast = parseRegex(value);
+						} catch (error) {
+							throw new SyntaxError(`Invalid RegExp at ${tokenPath}\n\n${error.message}`);
+						}
+
+						const parent = path.length > 1 ? path[path.length - 2].value : undefined;
+						callback({
+							pattern: value,
+							ast,
+							tokenPath,
+							name: key,
+							parent,
+							path,
+							lookbehind: key === 'pattern' && parent && !!parent.lookbehind,
+							reportError: message => errors.push(message)
+						});
 					} catch (error) {
-						throw new SyntaxError(`Invalid RegExp at ${tokenPath}\n\n${error.message}`);
+						errors.push(error);
 					}
-
-					const parent = path.length > 1 ? path[path.length - 2].value : undefined;
-					callback({
-						pattern: value,
-						ast,
-						tokenPath,
-						name: key,
-						parent,
-						path,
-						lookbehind: key === 'pattern' && parent && !!parent.lookbehind,
-						reportError: message => errors.push(message)
-					});
-				} catch (error) {
-					errors.push(error);
 				}
+			});
+		}
+
+		// static analysis
+		traverse(Prism.languages, 'Prism.languages');
+
+		// dynamic analysis
+		for (const lang of getRelevantLanguages()) {
+			const snippets = testSnippets.get(lang);
+			const grammar = Prism.languages[lang];
+
+			const oldTokenize = Prism.tokenize;
+			Prism.tokenize = function (_, grammar) {
+				const result = oldTokenize.apply(this, arguments);
+				traverse(grammar, lang + ': <Unknown>');
+				return result;
+			};
+
+			for (const snippet of (snippets || [])) {
+				Prism.highlight(snippet, grammar, lang);
 			}
-		});
+
+			Prism.tokenize = oldTokenize;
+		}
 
 		if (errors.length > 0) {
 			throw new Error(errors.map(e => String(e.message || e)).join('\n\n'));
@@ -165,91 +228,6 @@ function testPatterns(Prism) {
 		});
 	}
 
-	/**
-	 * Returns whether the given element will always have zero width meaning that it doesn't consume characters.
-	 *
-	 * @param {Element} element
-	 * @returns {boolean}
-	 */
-	function isAlwaysZeroWidth(element) {
-		switch (element.type) {
-			case 'Assertion':
-				// assertions == ^, $, \b, lookarounds
-				return true;
-			case 'Quantifier':
-				return element.max === 0 || isAlwaysZeroWidth(element.element);
-			case 'CapturingGroup':
-			case 'Group':
-				// every element in every alternative has to be of zero length
-				return element.alternatives.every(alt => alt.elements.every(isAlwaysZeroWidth));
-			case 'Backreference':
-				// on if the group referred to is of zero length
-				return isAlwaysZeroWidth(element.resolved);
-			default:
-				return false; // what's left are characters
-		}
-	}
-
-	/**
-	 * Returns whether the given element will always at the start of the whole match.
-	 *
-	 * @param {Element} element
-	 * @returns {boolean}
-	 */
-	function isFirstMatch(element) {
-		const parent = element.parent;
-		switch (parent.type) {
-			case 'Alternative': {
-				// all elements before this element have to of zero length
-				if (!parent.elements.slice(0, parent.elements.indexOf(element)).every(isAlwaysZeroWidth)) {
-					return false;
-				}
-				const grandParent = parent.parent;
-				if (grandParent.type === 'Pattern') {
-					return true;
-				} else {
-					return isFirstMatch(grandParent);
-				}
-			}
-
-			case 'Quantifier':
-				if (parent.max >= 2) {
-					return false;
-				} else {
-					return isFirstMatch(parent);
-				}
-
-			default:
-				throw new Error(`Internal error: The given node should not be a '${element.type}'.`);
-		}
-	}
-
-	/**
-	 * Returns whether the given node either is or is a child of what is effectively a Kleene star.
-	 *
-	 * @param {import("regexpp/ast").Node} node
-	 * @returns {boolean}
-	 */
-	function underAStar(node) {
-		if (node.type === 'Quantifier' && node.max > 10) {
-			return true;
-		} else if (node.parent) {
-			return underAStar(node.parent);
-		} else {
-			return false;
-		}
-	}
-
-	/**
-	 * @param {Iterable<T>} iter
-	 * @returns {T | undefined}
-	 * @template T
-	 */
-	function firstOf(iter) {
-		const [first] = iter;
-		return first;
-	}
-
 
 	it('- should not match the empty string', function () {
 		forEachPattern(({ pattern, tokenPath }) => {
@@ -384,221 +362,370 @@ function testPatterns(Prism) {
 	});
 
 	it('- should not cause exponential backtracking', function () {
-		/** @type {Transformers.CreationOptions} */
-		const options = {
-			ignoreOrder: true,
-			ignoreAmbiguity: true
-		};
-		const transformer = combineTransformers([
-			Transformers.inline(options),
-			Transformers.removeDeadBranches(options),
-			Transformers.unionCharacters(options),
-			Transformers.moveUpEmpty(options),
-			Transformers.nestedQuantifiers(options),
-			Transformers.sortAssertions(options),
-			Transformers.removeUnnecessaryAssertions(options),
-			Transformers.applyAssertions(options),
-		]);
-
-		forEachPattern(({ pattern, ast, tokenPath }) => {
-			const patternStr = String(pattern);
-			if (expoSafeRegexes.has(patternStr)) {
-				// we know that the pattern won't cause exp backtracking because we checked before
-				return;
-			}
+		replaceRegExpProto(exec => {
+			return function (input) {
+				checkExponentialBacktracking('<Unknown>', this);
+				return exec.call(this, input);
+			};
+		}, () => {
+			forEachPattern(({ pattern, ast, tokenPath }) => {
+				checkExponentialBacktracking(tokenPath, pattern, ast);
+			});
+		});
+	});
 
-			const parser = JS.Parser.fromAst(ast);
-			/**
-			 * Parses the given element and creates its NFA.
-			 *
-			 * @param {import("refa").JS.ParsableElement} element
-			 * @returns {NFA}
-			 */
-			function toNFA(element) {
-				let { expression, maxCharacter } = parser.parseElement(element, {
-					maxBackreferenceWords: 1000,
-					backreferences: 'disable'
-				});
+	it('- should not cause polynomial backtracking', function () {
+		replaceRegExpProto(exec => {
+			return function (input) {
+				checkPolynomialBacktracking('<Unknown>', this);
+				return exec.call(this, input);
+			};
+		}, () => {
+			forEachPattern(({ pattern, ast, tokenPath }) => {
+				checkPolynomialBacktracking(tokenPath, pattern, ast);
+			});
+		});
+	});
 
-				// try to remove assertions
-				expression = transform(transformer, expression);
+}
 
-				return NFA.fromRegex(expression, { maxCharacter }, { assertions: 'disable' });
-			}
 
-			/**
-			 * Checks whether the alternatives of the given node are disjoint. If the alternatives are not disjoint
-			 * and the give node is a descendant of an effective Kleene star, then an error will be thrown.
-			 *
-			 * @param {CapturingGroup | Group | LookaroundAssertion} node
-			 * @returns {void}
-			 */
-			function checkDisjointAlternatives(node) {
-				if (!underAStar(node) || node.alternatives.length < 2) {
-					return;
-				}
+/**
+ * Returns whether the given element will always have zero width meaning that it doesn't consume characters.
+ *
+ * @param {Element} element
+ * @returns {boolean}
+ */
+function isAlwaysZeroWidth(element) {
+	switch (element.type) {
+		case 'Assertion':
+			// assertions == ^, $, \b, lookarounds
+			return true;
+		case 'Quantifier':
+			return element.max === 0 || isAlwaysZeroWidth(element.element);
+		case 'CapturingGroup':
+		case 'Group':
+			// every element in every alternative has to be of zero length
+			return element.alternatives.every(alt => alt.elements.every(isAlwaysZeroWidth));
+		case 'Backreference':
+			// on if the group referred to is of zero length
+			return isAlwaysZeroWidth(element.resolved);
+		default:
+			return false; // what's left are characters
+	}
+}
 
-				const alternatives = node.alternatives;
-
-				const total = toNFA(alternatives[0]);
-				total.withoutEmptyWord();
-				for (let i = 1, l = alternatives.length; i < l; i++) {
-					const a = alternatives[i];
-					const current = toNFA(a);
-					current.withoutEmptyWord();
-
-					if (!total.isDisjointWith(current)) {
-						assert.fail(`${tokenPath}: The alternative \`${a.raw}\` is not disjoint with at least one previous alternative.`
-							+ ` This will cause exponential backtracking.`
-							+ `\n\nTo fix this issue, you have to rewrite the ${node.type} \`${node.raw}\`.`
-							+ ` The goal is that all of its alternatives are disjoint.`
-							+ ` This means that if a (sub-)string is matched by the ${node.type}, then only one of its alternatives can match the (sub-)string.`
-							+ `\n\nExample: \`(?:[ab]|\\w|::)+\``
-							+ `\nThe alternatives of the group are not disjoint because the string "a" can be matched by both \`[ab]\` and \`\\w\`.`
-							+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed because the \`[ab]\` is a subset of the \`\\w\`, so its enough to remove the \`[ab]\` alternative to get \`(?:\\w|::)+\` as the fixed pattern.`
-							+ `\nIn the real world, patterns can be a lot harder to fix.`
-							+ ` If you are trying to make the tests pass for a pull request but can\'t fix the issue yourself, then make the pull request (or commit) anyway.`
-							+ ` A maintainer will help you.`
-							+ `\n\nFull pattern:\n${pattern}`);
-					} else if (i !== l - 1) {
-						total.union(current);
-					}
-				}
+/**
+ * Returns whether the given element will always at the start of the whole match.
+ *
+ * @param {Element} element
+ * @returns {boolean}
+ */
+function isFirstMatch(element) {
+	const parent = element.parent;
+	switch (parent.type) {
+		case 'Alternative': {
+			// all elements before this element have to of zero length
+			if (!parent.elements.slice(0, parent.elements.indexOf(element)).every(isAlwaysZeroWidth)) {
+				return false;
 			}
+			const grandParent = parent.parent;
+			if (grandParent.type === 'Pattern') {
+				return true;
+			} else {
+				return isFirstMatch(grandParent);
+			}
+		}
 
-			visitRegExpAST(ast.pattern, {
-				onCapturingGroupLeave: checkDisjointAlternatives,
-				onGroupLeave: checkDisjointAlternatives,
-				onAssertionLeave(node) {
-					if (node.kind === 'lookahead' || node.kind === 'lookbehind') {
-						checkDisjointAlternatives(node);
-					}
-				},
+		case 'Quantifier':
+			if (parent.max >= 2) {
+				return false;
+			} else {
+				return isFirstMatch(parent);
+			}
 
-				onQuantifierLeave(node) {
-					if (node.max < 10) {
-						return; // not a star
-					}
-					if (node.element.type !== 'CapturingGroup' && node.element.type !== 'Group') {
-						return; // not a group
-					}
+		default:
+			throw new Error(`Internal error: The given node should not be a '${element.type}'.`);
+	}
+}
 
-					// The idea here is the following:
-					//
-					// We have found a part `A*` of the regex (`A` is assumed to not accept the empty word). Let `I` be
-					// the intersection of `A` and `A{2,}`. If `I` is not empty, then there exists a non-empty word `w`
-					// that is accepted by both `A` and `A{2,}`. That means that there exists some `m>1` for which `w`
-					// is accepted by `A{m}`.
-					// This means that there are at least two ways `A*` can accept `w`. It can be accepted as `A` or as
-					// `A{m}`. Hence there are at least 2^n ways for `A*` to accept the word `w{n}`. This is the main
-					// requirement for exponential backtracking.
-					//
-					// This is actually only a crude approximation for the real analysis that would have to be done. We
-					// would actually have to check the intersection `A{p}` and `A{p+1,}` for all p>0. However, in most
-					// cases, the approximation is good enough.
-
-					const nfa = toNFA(node.element);
-					nfa.withoutEmptyWord();
-					const twoStar = nfa.copy();
-					twoStar.quantify(2, Infinity);
-
-					if (!nfa.isDisjointWith(twoStar)) {
-						const word = Words.pickMostReadableWord(firstOf(nfa.intersectionWordSets(twoStar)));
-						const example = Words.fromUnicodeToString(word);
-						assert.fail(`${tokenPath}: The quantifier \`${node.raw}\` ambiguous for all words ${JSON.stringify(example)}.repeat(n) for any n>1.`
-							+ ` This will cause exponential backtracking.`
-							+ `\n\nTo fix this issue, you have to rewrite the element (let's call it E) of the quantifier.`
-							+ ` The goal is modify E such that it is disjoint with repetitions of itself.`
-							+ ` This means that if a (sub-)string is matched by E, then it must not be possible for E{2}, E{3}, E{4}, etc. to match that (sub-)string.`
-							+ `\n\nExample 1: \`(?:\\w+|::)+\``
-							+ `\nThe problem lies in \`\\w+\` because \`\\w+\` and \`(?:\\w+){2}\` are not disjoint as the string "aa" is fully matched by both.`
-							+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed by changing \`\\w+\` to \`\\w\`.`
-							+ `\nExample 2: \`(?:\\w|Foo)+\``
-							+ `\nThe problem lies in \`\\w\` and \`Foo\` because the string "Foo" can be matched as either repeating \`\\w\` 3 times or by using the \`Foo\` alternative once.`
-							+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed because the \`Foo\` alternative is redundant can can be removed.`
-							+ `\nExample 3: \`(?:\\.\\w+(?:<.*?>)?)+\``
-							+ `\nThe problem lies in \`<.*?>\`. The string ".a<>.a<>" can be matched as either \`\\. \\w < . . . . >\` or \`\\. \\w < > \\. \\w < >\`.`
-							+ ` When it comes to exponential backtracking, it doesn't matter whether a quantifier is greedy or lazy.`
-							+ ` This means that the lazy \`.*?\` can jump over \`>\`.`
-							+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed because we just have to prevent \`.*?\` jumping over \`>\`.`
-							+ ` This can done by replacing \`<.*?>\` with \`<[^\\r\\n>]*>\`.`
-							+ `\n\nIn the real world, patterns can be a lot harder to fix.`
-							+ ` If you are trying to make this test pass for a pull request but can\'t fix the issue yourself, then make the pull request (or commit) anyway, a maintainer will help you.`
-							+ `\n\nFull pattern:\n${pattern}`);
-					}
-				},
-			});
+/**
+ * Returns whether the given node either is or is a child of what is effectively a Kleene star.
+ *
+ * @param {import("regexpp/ast").Node} node
+ * @returns {boolean}
+ */
+function underAStar(node) {
+	if (node.type === 'Quantifier' && node.max > 10) {
+		return true;
+	} else if (node.parent) {
+		return underAStar(node.parent);
+	} else {
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {Iterable<T>} iter
+ * @returns {T | undefined}
+ * @template T
+ */
+function firstOf(iter) {
+	const [first] = iter;
+	return first;
+}
+
+/**
+ * A set of all safe (non-exponentially backtracking) RegExp literals (string).
+ *
+ * @type {Set<string | RegExp>}
+ */
+const expoSafeRegexes = new Set();
 
-			expoSafeRegexes.add(patternStr);
+/** @type {Transformers.CreationOptions} */
+const options = {
+	ignoreOrder: true,
+	ignoreAmbiguity: true
+};
+const transformer = combineTransformers([
+	Transformers.inline(options),
+	Transformers.removeDeadBranches(options),
+	Transformers.unionCharacters(options),
+	Transformers.moveUpEmpty(options),
+	Transformers.nestedQuantifiers(options),
+	Transformers.sortAssertions(options),
+	Transformers.removeUnnecessaryAssertions(options),
+	Transformers.applyAssertions(options),
+]);
+
+
+/**
+ * @param {string} path
+ * @param {RegExp} pattern
+ * @param {LiteralAST} [ast]
+ * @returns {void}
+ */
+function checkExponentialBacktracking(path, pattern, ast) {
+	if (expoSafeRegexes.has(pattern)) {
+		// we know that the pattern won't cause exp backtracking because we checked before
+		return;
+	}
+	const patternStr = String(pattern);
+	if (expoSafeRegexes.has(patternStr)) {
+		// we know that the pattern won't cause exp backtracking because we checked before
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (!ast) {
+		ast = parseRegex(pattern);
+	}
+
+	const parser = JS.Parser.fromAst(ast);
+	/**
+	 * Parses the given element and creates its NFA.
+	 *
+	 * @param {import("refa").JS.ParsableElement} element
+	 * @returns {NFA}
+	 */
+	function toNFA(element) {
+		let { expression, maxCharacter } = parser.parseElement(element, {
+			maxBackreferenceWords: 1000,
+			backreferences: 'disable'
 		});
-	});
 
-	it('- should not cause polynomial backtracking', function () {
-		forEachPattern(({ pattern, ast, tokenPath }) => {
-			const patternStr = String(pattern);
-			if (polySafeRegexes.has(patternStr)) {
-				// we know that the pattern won't cause poly backtracking because we checked before
-				return;
+		return NFA.fromRegex(transform(transformer, expression), { maxCharacter }, { assertions: 'disable' });
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Checks whether the alternatives of the given node are disjoint. If the alternatives are not disjoint
+	 * and the give node is a descendant of an effective Kleene star, then an error will be thrown.
+	 *
+	 * @param {CapturingGroup | Group | LookaroundAssertion} node
+	 * @returns {void}
+	 */
+	function checkDisjointAlternatives(node) {
+		if (!underAStar(node) || node.alternatives.length < 2) {
+			return;
+		}
+
+		const alternatives = node.alternatives;
+
+		const total = toNFA(alternatives[0]);
+		total.withoutEmptyWord();
+		for (let i = 1, l = alternatives.length; i < l; i++) {
+			const a = alternatives[i];
+			const current = toNFA(a);
+			current.withoutEmptyWord();
+
+			if (!total.isDisjointWith(current)) {
+				assert.fail(`${path}: The alternative \`${a.raw}\` is not disjoint with at least one previous alternative.`
+					+ ` This will cause exponential backtracking.`
+					+ `\n\nTo fix this issue, you have to rewrite the ${node.type} \`${node.raw}\`.`
+					+ ` The goal is that all of its alternatives are disjoint.`
+					+ ` This means that if a (sub-)string is matched by the ${node.type}, then only one of its alternatives can match the (sub-)string.`
+					+ `\n\nExample: \`(?:[ab]|\\w|::)+\``
+					+ `\nThe alternatives of the group are not disjoint because the string "a" can be matched by both \`[ab]\` and \`\\w\`.`
+					+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed because the \`[ab]\` is a subset of the \`\\w\`, so its enough to remove the \`[ab]\` alternative to get \`(?:\\w|::)+\` as the fixed pattern.`
+					+ `\nIn the real world, patterns can be a lot harder to fix.`
+					+ ` If you are trying to make the tests pass for a pull request but can\'t fix the issue yourself, then make the pull request (or commit) anyway.`
+					+ ` A maintainer will help you.`
+					+ `\n\nFull pattern:\n${pattern}`);
+			} else if (i !== l - 1) {
+				total.union(current);
 			}
+		}
+	}
 
-			const result = scslre.analyse(ast, { maxReports: 1, reportTypes: { 'Move': false } });
-			if (result.reports.length > 0) {
-				const report = result.reports[0];
-
-				let rangeOffset;
-				let rangeStr;
-				let rangeHighlight;
-
-				switch (report.type) {
-					case 'Trade': {
-						const start = Math.min(report.startQuant.start, report.endQuant.start);
-						const end = Math.max(report.startQuant.end, report.endQuant.end);
-						rangeOffset = start + 1;
-						rangeStr = patternStr.substring(start + 1, end + 1);
-						rangeHighlight = highlight([
-							{ ...report.startQuant, label: 'start' },
-							{ ...report.endQuant, label: 'end' }
-						], -start);
-						break;
-					}
-					case 'Self': {
-						rangeOffset = report.parentQuant.start + 1;
-						rangeStr = patternStr.substring(report.parentQuant.start + 1, report.parentQuant.end + 1);
-						rangeHighlight = highlight([{ ...report.quant, label: 'self' }], -report.parentQuant.start);
-						break;
-					}
-					case 'Move': {
-						rangeOffset = 1;
-						rangeStr = patternStr.substring(1, report.quant.end + 1);
-						rangeHighlight = highlight([report.quant]);
-						break;
-					}
-					default:
-						throw new Error('Invalid report type "' + report.type + '". This should never happen.');
-				}
+	visitRegExpAST(ast.pattern, {
+		onCapturingGroupLeave: checkDisjointAlternatives,
+		onGroupLeave: checkDisjointAlternatives,
+		onAssertionLeave(node) {
+			if (node.kind === 'lookahead' || node.kind === 'lookbehind') {
+				checkDisjointAlternatives(node);
+			}
+		},
 
-				const attackChar = `/${report.character.literal.source}/${report.character.literal.flags}`;
-				const fixed = report.fix();
-
-				assert.fail(
-					`${tokenPath}: ${report.exponential ? 'Exponential' : 'Polynomial'} backtracking. `
-					+ `By repeating any character that matches ${attackChar}, an attack string can be created.`
-					+ `\n`
-					+ `\n${indent(rangeStr)}`
-					+ `\n${indent(rangeHighlight)}`
-					+ `\n`
-					+ `\nFull pattern:`
-					+ `\n${patternStr}`
-					+ `\n${indent(rangeHighlight, ' '.repeat(rangeOffset))}`
-					+ `\n`
-					+ `\n` + (fixed ? `Fixed:\n/${fixed.source}/${fixed.flags}` : `Fix not available.`)
-				);
+		onQuantifierLeave(node) {
+			if (node.max < 10) {
+				return; // not a star
+			}
+			if (node.element.type !== 'CapturingGroup' && node.element.type !== 'Group') {
+				return; // not a group
 			}
 
-			polySafeRegexes.add(patternStr);
-		});
+			// The idea here is the following:
+			//
+			// We have found a part `A*` of the regex (`A` is assumed to not accept the empty word). Let `I` be
+			// the intersection of `A` and `A{2,}`. If `I` is not empty, then there exists a non-empty word `w`
+			// that is accepted by both `A` and `A{2,}`. That means that there exists some `m>1` for which `w`
+			// is accepted by `A{m}`.
+			// This means that there are at least two ways `A*` can accept `w`. It can be accepted as `A` or as
+			// `A{m}`. Hence there are at least 2^n ways for `A*` to accept the word `w{n}`. This is the main
+			// requirement for exponential backtracking.
+			//
+			// This is actually only a crude approximation for the real analysis that would have to be done. We
+			// would actually have to check the intersection `A{p}` and `A{p+1,}` for all p>0. However, in most
+			// cases, the approximation is good enough.
+
+			const nfa = toNFA(node.element);
+			nfa.withoutEmptyWord();
+			const twoStar = nfa.copy();
+			twoStar.quantify(2, Infinity);
+
+			if (!nfa.isDisjointWith(twoStar)) {
+				const word = Words.pickMostReadableWord(firstOf(nfa.intersectionWordSets(twoStar)));
+				const example = Words.fromUnicodeToString(word);
+				assert.fail(`${path}: The quantifier \`${node.raw}\` ambiguous for all words ${JSON.stringify(example)}.repeat(n) for any n>1.`
+					+ ` This will cause exponential backtracking.`
+					+ `\n\nTo fix this issue, you have to rewrite the element (let's call it E) of the quantifier.`
+					+ ` The goal is modify E such that it is disjoint with repetitions of itself.`
+					+ ` This means that if a (sub-)string is matched by E, then it must not be possible for E{2}, E{3}, E{4}, etc. to match that (sub-)string.`
+					+ `\n\nExample 1: \`(?:\\w+|::)+\``
+					+ `\nThe problem lies in \`\\w+\` because \`\\w+\` and \`(?:\\w+){2}\` are not disjoint as the string "aa" is fully matched by both.`
+					+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed by changing \`\\w+\` to \`\\w\`.`
+					+ `\nExample 2: \`(?:\\w|Foo)+\``
+					+ `\nThe problem lies in \`\\w\` and \`Foo\` because the string "Foo" can be matched as either repeating \`\\w\` 3 times or by using the \`Foo\` alternative once.`
+					+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed because the \`Foo\` alternative is redundant can can be removed.`
+					+ `\nExample 3: \`(?:\\.\\w+(?:<.*?>)?)+\``
+					+ `\nThe problem lies in \`<.*?>\`. The string ".a<>.a<>" can be matched as either \`\\. \\w < . . . . >\` or \`\\. \\w < > \\. \\w < >\`.`
+					+ ` When it comes to exponential backtracking, it doesn't matter whether a quantifier is greedy or lazy.`
+					+ ` This means that the lazy \`.*?\` can jump over \`>\`.`
+					+ ` In this example, the pattern can easily be fixed because we just have to prevent \`.*?\` jumping over \`>\`.`
+					+ ` This can done by replacing \`<.*?>\` with \`<[^\\r\\n>]*>\`.`
+					+ `\n\nIn the real world, patterns can be a lot harder to fix.`
+					+ ` If you are trying to make this test pass for a pull request but can\'t fix the issue yourself, then make the pull request (or commit) anyway, a maintainer will help you.`
+					+ `\n\nFull pattern:\n${pattern}`);
+			}
+		},
 	});
 
+	expoSafeRegexes.add(pattern);
+	expoSafeRegexes.add(patternStr);
+}
+
+/**
+ * A set of all safe (non-polynomially backtracking) RegExp literals (string).
+ *
+ * @type {Set<string | RegExp>}
+ */
+const polySafeRegexes = new Set();
+/**
+ * @param {string} path
+ * @param {RegExp} pattern
+ * @param {LiteralAST} [ast]
+ * @returns {void}
+ */
+function checkPolynomialBacktracking(path, pattern, ast) {
+	if (polySafeRegexes.has(pattern)) {
+		// we know that the pattern won't cause poly backtracking because we checked before
+		return;
+	}
+	const patternStr = String(pattern);
+	if (polySafeRegexes.has(patternStr)) {
+		// we know that the pattern won't cause poly backtracking because we checked before
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (!ast) {
+		ast = parseRegex(pattern);
+	}
+
+	const result = scslre.analyse(ast, { maxReports: 1, reportTypes: { 'Move': false } });
+	if (result.reports.length > 0) {
+		const report = result.reports[0];
+
+		let rangeOffset;
+		let rangeStr;
+		let rangeHighlight;
+
+		switch (report.type) {
+			case 'Trade': {
+				const start = Math.min(report.startQuant.start, report.endQuant.start);
+				const end = Math.max(report.startQuant.end, report.endQuant.end);
+				rangeOffset = start + 1;
+				rangeStr = patternStr.substring(start + 1, end + 1);
+				rangeHighlight = highlight([
+					{ ...report.startQuant, label: 'start' },
+					{ ...report.endQuant, label: 'end' }
+				], -start);
+				break;
+			}
+			case 'Self': {
+				rangeOffset = report.parentQuant.start + 1;
+				rangeStr = patternStr.substring(report.parentQuant.start + 1, report.parentQuant.end + 1);
+				rangeHighlight = highlight([{ ...report.quant, label: 'self' }], -report.parentQuant.start);
+				break;
+			}
+			case 'Move': {
+				rangeOffset = 1;
+				rangeStr = patternStr.substring(1, report.quant.end + 1);
+				rangeHighlight = highlight([report.quant]);
+				break;
+			}
+			default:
+				throw new Error('Invalid report type. This should never happen.');
+		}
+
+		const attackChar = `/${report.character.literal.source}/${report.character.literal.flags}`;
+		const fixed = report.fix();
+
+		assert.fail(
+			`${path}: ${report.exponential ? 'Exponential' : 'Polynomial'} backtracking. `
+			+ `By repeating any character that matches ${attackChar}, an attack string can be created.`
+			+ `\n`
+			+ `\n${indent(rangeStr)}`
+			+ `\n${indent(rangeHighlight)}`
+			+ `\n`
+			+ `\nFull pattern:`
+			+ `\n${patternStr}`
+			+ `\n${indent(rangeHighlight, ' '.repeat(rangeOffset))}`
+			+ `\n`
+			+ `\n` + (fixed ? `Fixed:\n/${fixed.source}/${fixed.flags}` : `Fix not available.`)
+		);
+	}
+
+	polySafeRegexes.add(pattern);
+	polySafeRegexes.add(patternStr);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -609,6 +736,7 @@ function testPatterns(Prism) {
  * @typedef Highlight
  * @property {number} start
  * @property {number} end
+ * @property {string} [label]
  */
 function highlight(highlights, offset = 0) {
 	highlights.sort((a, b) => a.start - b.start);
@@ -646,3 +774,47 @@ function highlight(highlights, offset = 0) {
 function indent(str, amount = '    ') {
 	return str.split(/\r?\n/g).map(m => m === '' ? '' : amount + m).join('\n');
 }
+
+/**
+ * @param {(exec: RegExp["exec"]) => RegExp["exec"]} execSupplier
+ * @param {() => void} fn
+ */
+function replaceRegExpProto(execSupplier, fn) {
+	const oldExec = RegExp.prototype.exec;
+	const oldTest = RegExp.prototype.test;
+	const newExec = execSupplier(oldExec);
+
+	RegExp.prototype.exec = newExec;
+	RegExp.prototype.test = function (input) {
+		return newExec.call(this, input) !== null;
+	};
+
+	let error;
+	try {
+		fn();
+	} catch (e) {
+		error = e;
+	}
+
+	RegExp.prototype.exec = oldExec;
+	RegExp.prototype.test = oldTest;
+
+	if (error) {
+		throw error;
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {undefined | null | T | T[]} value
+ * @returns {T[]}
+ * @template T
+ */
+function toArray(value) {
+	if (Array.isArray(value)) {
+		return value;
+	} else if (value != null) {
+		return [value];
+	} else {
+		return [];
+	}
+}