docs: document our API/ABI stability stance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69
diff --git a/docs/api-stability.md b/docs/api-stability.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a02e864
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/api-stability.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+The maintainers of the libgit2 project believe that having a stable API
+to program against is important for our users and the ecosystem - whether
+you're building against the libgit2 C APIs directly, creating a wrapper to
+a managed language, or programming against one of those managed wrappers
+like LibGit2Sharp or Rugged.
+
+Our API stability considerations are:
+
+* Our standard API is considered stable through a major release.
+
+ * We define our "standard API" to be anything included in the "git2.h"
+ header - in other words, anything defined in a header in the `git2`
+ directory.
+
+ * APIs will maintain their signature and will not be removed within a
+ major release, but new APIs may be added.
+
+ * Any APIs may be marked as deprecated within a major release, but will
+ not be removed until the next major release (at the earliest). You
+ may define `GIT_DEPRECATE_HARD` to produce compiler warnings if you
+ target these deprecated APIs.
+
+ * We consider API compatibility to be against the C APIs. That means
+ that we may use macros to keep API compatibility - for example, if we
+ rename a structure from `git_widget_options` to `git_foobar_options`
+ then we would `#define git_widget_options git_foobar_options` to retain
+ API compatibility. Note that this does _not_ provide ABI compatibility.
+
+* Our systems API is only considered stable through a _minor_ release.
+
+ * We define our "systems API" to be anything included in the `git2/sys`
+ directory. These are not "standard" APIs but are mechanisms to extend
+ libgit2 by adding new extensions - for example, a custom HTTPS transport,
+ TLS engine, or merge strategy.
+
+ * Additionally, the cmake options and the resulting constants that it
+ produces to be "systems API".
+
+ * Generally these mechanism are well defined and will not need significant
+ changes, but are considered a part of the library itself and may need
+
+ * Systems API changes will be noted specially within a release's changelog.
+
+* Our ABI is only considered stable through a _minor_ release.
+
+ * Our ABI consists of actual symbol names in the library, the function
+ signatures, and the actual layout of structures. These are only
+ stable within minor releases, they are not stable within major releases
+ (yet).
+
+ * Since many FFIs use ABIs directly (for example, .NET P/Invoke or Rust),
+ this instability is unfortunate.
+
+ * In a future major release, we will begin providing ABI stability
+ throughout the major release cycle.
+
+ * ABI changes will be noted specially within a release's changelog.
+
+* Point releases are _generally_ only for bugfixes, and generally do _not_
+ include new features. This means that point releases generally do _not_
+ include new APIs. Point releases will never break API, systems API or
+ ABI compatibility.
+