|
125655fe
|
2013-07-02T16:49:57
|
|
Untracked directories with .git should be ignored
This restores a behavior that was accidentally lost during some
diff refactoring where an untracked directory that contains a .git
item should be treated as IGNORED, not as UNTRACKED. The submodule
code already detects this, but the diff code was not handling the
scenario right.
This also updates a number of existing tests that were actually
exercising the behavior but did not have the right expectations in
place. It actually makes the new
`test_diff_submodules__diff_ignore_options` test feel much better
because the "not-a-submodule" entries are now ignored instead of
showing up as untracked items.
Fixes #1697
|
|
1fed6b07
|
2013-05-13T21:57:37
|
|
Fix trailing whitespaces
|
|
ad26434b
|
2013-04-09T14:52:32
|
|
Tests and more fixes for submodule diffs
This adds tests for diffs with submodules in them and (perhaps
unsurprisingly) requires further fixes to be made. Specifically,
this fixes:
- when considering if a submodule is dirty in the workdir, it was
being treated as dirty even if only the index was dirty.
- git_diff_patch_to_str (and git_diff_patch_print) were "printing"
the headers for files (and submodules) that were unmodified or
had no meaningful content.
- added comment to previous fix and removed unneeded parens.
|
|
0e60b637
|
2013-03-29T18:36:11
|
|
free!
|
|
ccfa6805
|
2013-03-25T23:58:40
|
|
Fix some diff ignores and submodule dirty workdir
This started out trying to look at the problems from issue #1425
and gradually grew to a broader set of fixes. There are two core
things fixed here:
1. When you had an ignore like "/bin" which is rooted at the top
of your tree, instead of immediately adding the "bin/" entry
as an ignored item in the diff, we were returning all of the
direct descendants of the directory as ignored items. This
changes things to immediately ignore the directory. Note that
this effects the behavior in test_status_ignore__subdirectories
so that we no longer exactly match core gits ignore behavior,
but the new behavior probably makes more sense (i.e. we now
will include an ignored directory inside an untracked directory
that we previously would have left off).
2. When a submodule only contained working directory changes, the
diff code was always considering it unmodified which was just
an outright bug. The HEAD SHA of the submodule matches the SHA
in the parent repo index, and since the SHAs matches, the diff
code was overwriting the actual status with UNMODIFIED.
These fixes broke existing tests test_diff_workdir__submodules and
test_status_ignore__subdirectories but looking it over, I actually
think the new results are correct and the old results were wrong.
@nulltoken had actually commented on the subdirectory ignore issue
previously.
I also included in the tests some debugging versions of the
shared iteration callback routines that print status or diff
information. These aren't used actively in the tests, but can be
quickly swapped in to test code to give a better picture of what
is being scanned in some of the complex test scenarios.
|
|
37ee70fa
|
2013-03-25T22:19:39
|
|
Implement GIT_STATUS_OPT_EXCLUDE_SUBMODULES
This option has been sitting unimplemented for a while, so I
finally went through and implemented it along with some tests.
As part of this, I improved the implementation of
GIT_DIFF_IGNORE_SUBMODULES so it be more diligent about avoiding
extra work and about leaving off delta records for submodules to
the greatest extent possible (though it may include them still
if you are request TYPECHANGE records).
|
|
5f4a61ae
|
2012-08-09T19:43:25
|
|
Working implementation of git_submodule_status
This is a big redesign of the git_submodule_status API and the
implementation of the redesigned API. It also fixes a number of
bugs that I found in other parts of the submodule API while
writing the tests for the status part.
This also fixes a couple of bugs in the iterators that had not
been noticed before - one with iterating when there is a gitlink
(i.e. separate-work-dir) and one where I was treating anything
even vaguely submodule-like as a submodule, more aggressively
than core git does.
|
|
aa13bf05
|
2012-08-02T13:00:58
|
|
Major submodule rewrite
This replaces the old submodule API with a new extended API that
supports most of the things that can be done with `git submodule`.
|
|
904b67e6
|
2012-05-18T01:48:50
|
|
errors: Rename error codes
|
|
e172cf08
|
2012-05-18T01:21:06
|
|
errors: Rename the generic return codes
|
|
41a82592
|
2012-05-15T14:17:39
|
|
Ranged iterators and rewritten git_status_file
The goal of this work is to rewrite git_status_file to use the
same underlying code as git_status_foreach.
This is done in 3 phases:
1. Extend iterators to allow ranged iteration with start and
end prefixes for the range of file names to be covered.
2. Improve diff so that when there is a pathspec and there is
a common non-wildcard prefix of the pathspec, it will use
ranged iterators to minimize excess iteration.
3. Rewrite git_status_file to call git_status_foreach_ext
with a pathspec that covers just the one file being checked.
Since ranged iterators underlie the status & diff implementation,
this is actually fairly efficient. The workdir iterator does
end up loading the contents of all the directories down to the
single file, which should ideally be avoided, but it is pretty
good.
|
|
dc13f1f7
|
2012-05-10T11:08:59
|
|
Add cache busting to attribute cache
This makes the git attributes and git ignores cache check
stat information before using the file contents from the
cache. For cached files from the index, it checks the SHA
of the file instead. This should reduce the need to ever
call `git_attr_cache_flush()` in most situations.
This commit also fixes the `git_status_should_ignore` API
to use the libgit2 standard parameter ordering.
|
|
8e8b6b01
|
2012-04-04T13:13:43
|
|
Clean up valgrind warnings
|
|
bfc9ca59
|
2012-03-28T16:45:36
|
|
Added submodule API and use in status
When processing status for a newly checked out repo, it is
possible that there will be submodules that have not yet been
initialized. The only way to distinguish these from untracked
directories is to have some knowledge of submodules. This
commit adds a new submodule API which, given a name or path,
can determine if it appears to be a submodule and can give
information about the submodule.
|
|
277e3041
|
2012-03-26T11:22:27
|
|
Fix handling of submodules in trees
|
|
a56aacf4
|
2012-03-22T12:03:30
|
|
More status testing
This "fixes" the broken t18 status tests to accurately reflect
the new behavior for "created" untracked subdirectories. See
discussion in the PR for more details.
This also contains the submodules unit test that I forgot to
git add, and ports most of the t18-status.c tests to clar (still
missing a couple of the git_status_file() single file tests).
|