src/crlf.c


Log

Author Commit Date CI Message
Ben Straub f2d42eea 2012-07-09T20:21:22 Checkout: add structure for CRLF.
Vicent Martí 904b67e6 2012-05-18T01:48:50 errors: Rename error codes
Vicent Martí e172cf08 2012-05-18T01:21:06 errors: Rename the generic return codes
Vicent Martí 29e948de 2012-05-10T10:38:10 global: Change parameter ordering in API Consistency is good.
Russell Belfer f917481e 2012-05-03T16:37:25 Support reading attributes from index Depending on the operation, we need to consider gitattributes in both the work dir and the index. This adds a parameter to all of the gitattributes related functions that allows user control of attribute reading behavior (i.e. prefer workdir, prefer index, only use index). This fix also covers allowing us to check attributes (and hence do diff and status) on bare repositories. This was a somewhat larger change that I hoped because it had to change the cache key used for gitattributes files.
Vicent Martí 3fbcac89 2012-05-02T19:56:38 Remove old and unused error codes
nulltoken fa6420f7 2012-04-29T21:46:33 buf: deploy git_buf_len()
Vicent Martí cb8a7961 2012-03-07T00:02:55 error-handling: Repository This also includes droping `git_buf_lasterror` because it makes no sense in the new system. Note that in most of the places were it has been dropped, the code needs cleanup. I.e. GIT_ENOMEM is going away, so instead it should return a generic `-1` and obviously not throw anything.
Russell Belfer ce49c7a8 2012-03-02T15:09:40 Add filter tests and fix some bugs This adds some initial unit tests for file filtering and fixes some simple bugs in filter application.
Vicent Martí f2c25d18 2012-03-02T20:08:00 config: Implement a proper cvar cache
Vicent Martí c63793ee 2012-03-02T03:51:45 attr: Change the attribute check macros The point of having `GIT_ATTR_TRUE` and `GIT_ATTR_FALSE` macros is to be able to change the way that true and false values are stored inside of the returned gitattributes value pointer. However, if these macros are implemented as a simple rename for the `git_attr__true` pointer, they will always be used with the `==` operator, and hence we cannot really change the implementation to any other way that doesn't imply using special pointer values and comparing them! We need to do the same thing that core Git does, which is using a function macro. With `GIT_ATTR_TRUE(attr)`, we can change internally the way that these values are stored to anything we want. This commit does that, and rewrites a large chunk of the attributes test suite to remove duplicated code for expected attributes, and to properly test the function macro behavior instead of comparing pointers.
Vicent Martí 47a899ff 2012-03-01T21:19:51 filter: Beautiful refactoring Comments soothe my soul.
Vicent Martí 27950fa3 2012-02-29T01:26:03 filter: Add write-to CRLF filter