tests/repo/template.c


Log

Author Commit Date CI Message
Edward Thomson f9c4dc10 2021-11-22T11:23:50 Merge pull request #6106 from ammgws/fixtemplateerr Fix repo init when template dir is non-existent
Jason Nader bc0d1ad2 2021-11-05T03:08:43 tests: try to init with non-existent template path
Edward Thomson 95117d47 2021-10-31T09:45:46 path: separate git-specific path functions from util Introduce `git_fs_path`, which operates on generic filesystem paths. `git_path` will be kept for only git-specific path functionality (for example, checking for `.git` in a path).
Edward Thomson f0e693b1 2021-09-07T17:53:49 str: introduce `git_str` for internal, `git_buf` is external libgit2 has two distinct requirements that were previously solved by `git_buf`. We require: 1. A general purpose string class that provides a number of utility APIs for manipulating data (eg, concatenating, truncating, etc). 2. A structure that we can use to return strings to callers that they can take ownership of. By using a single class (`git_buf`) for both of these purposes, we have confused the API to the point that refactorings are difficult and reasoning about correctness is also difficult. Move the utility class `git_buf` to be called `git_str`: this represents its general purpose, as an internal string buffer class. The name also is an homage to Junio Hamano ("gitstr"). The public API remains `git_buf`, and has a much smaller footprint. It is generally only used as an "out" param with strict requirements that follow the documentation. (Exceptions exist for some legacy APIs to avoid breaking callers unnecessarily.) Utility functions exist to convert a user-specified `git_buf` to a `git_str` so that we can call internal functions, then converting it back again.
Patrick Steinhardt e54343a4 2019-06-29T09:17:32 fileops: rename to "futils.h" to match function signatures Our file utils functions all have a "futils" prefix, e.g. `git_futils_touch`. One would thus naturally guess that their definitions and implementation would live in files "futils.h" and "futils.c", respectively, but in fact they live in "fileops.h". Rename the files to match expectations.
Patrick Steinhardt 9d46f167 2019-07-19T10:50:51 repository: do not initialize HEAD if it's provided by templates When using templates to initialize a git repository, then git-init(1) will copy over all contents of the template directory. These will be preferred over the default ones created by git-init(1). While we mostly do the same, there is the exception of "HEAD". While we do copy over the template's HEAD file, afterwards we'll immediately re-initialize its contents with either the default "ref: refs/origin/master" or the init option's `initial_head` field. Let's fix the inconsistency with upstream git-init(1) by not overwriting the template HEAD, but only if the user hasn't set `opts.initial_head`. If the `initial_head` field has been supplied, we should use that indifferent from whether the template contained a HEAD file or not. Add tests to verify we correctly use the template directory's HEAD file and that `initial_head` overrides the template.
Patrick Steinhardt 0d12b8dd 2019-07-19T09:43:34 tests: repo: refactor setup of templates and repos All tests in repo::template have a common pattern of first setting up templates, then settung up the repository that makes use of those templates via several init options. Refactor this pattern into two functions `setup_templates` and `setup_repo` that handle most of that logic to make it easier to spot what a test actually wants to check. Furthermore, this also refactors how we clean up after the tests. Previously, it was a combination of manually calling `cl_fixture_cleanup` and `cl_set_cleanup`, which really is kind of hard to read. This commit refactors this to instead provide the cleaning parameters in the setup functions. All cleanups are then performed in the suite's cleanup function.
Patrick Steinhardt 3b79ceaf 2019-07-19T08:58:12 tests: repo: refactor template path handling The repo::template test suite makes use of quite a few local variables that could be consolidated. Do so to make the code easier to read.
Patrick Steinhardt ee193480 2019-07-19T08:45:45 tests: repo: move template tests into their own suite There's quite a lot of supporting code for our templates and they are an obvious standalone feature. Thus, let's extract those tests into their own suite to also make refactoring of them easier.