Edit

IABSD.fr/src/gnu/llvm/docs/ReleaseProcess.rst

Branch :

  • Show log

    Commit

  • Author : patrick
    Date : 2019-01-27 16:42:12
    Hash : b773203f
    Message : Import LLVM 7.0.1 release including clang, lld and lldb.

  • gnu/llvm/docs/ReleaseProcess.rst
  • =============================
    How To Validate a New Release
    =============================
    
    .. contents::
       :local:
       :depth: 1
    
    Introduction
    ============
    
    This document contains information about testing the release candidates that
    will ultimately be the next LLVM release. For more information on how to
    manage the actual release, please refer to :doc:`HowToReleaseLLVM`.
    
    Overview of the Release Process
    -------------------------------
    
    Once the release process starts, the Release Manager will ask for volunteers,
    and it'll be the role of each volunteer to:
    
    * Test and benchmark the previous release
    
    * Test and benchmark each release candidate, comparing to the previous release
      and candidates
    
    * Identify, reduce and report every regression found during tests and benchmarks
    
    * Make sure the critical bugs get fixed and merged to the next release candidate
    
    Not all bugs or regressions are show-stoppers and it's a bit of a grey area what
    should be fixed before the next candidate and what can wait until the next
    release.
    
    It'll depend on:
    
    * The severity of the bug, how many people it affects and if it's a regression
      or a known bug. Known bugs are "unsupported features" and some bugs can be
      disabled if they have been implemented recently.
    
    * The stage in the release. Less critical bugs should be considered to be
      fixed between RC1 and RC2, but not so much at the end of it.
    
    * If it's a correctness or a performance regression. Performance regression
      tends to be taken more lightly than correctness.
    
    .. _scripts:
    
    Scripts
    =======
    
    The scripts are in the ``utils/release`` directory.
    
    test-release.sh
    ---------------
    
    This script will check-out, configure and compile LLVM+Clang (+ most add-ons,
    like ``compiler-rt``, ``libcxx``, ``libomp`` and ``clang-extra-tools``) in
    three stages, and will test the final stage.
    It'll have installed the final binaries on the Phase3/Releasei(+Asserts)
    directory, and that's the one you should use for the test-suite and other
    external tests.
    
    To run the script on a specific release candidate run::
    
       ./test-release.sh \
            -release 3.3 \
            -rc 1 \
            -no-64bit \
            -test-asserts \
            -no-compare-files
    
    Each system will require different options. For instance, x86_64 will
    obviously not need ``-no-64bit`` while 32-bit systems will, or the script will
    fail.
    
    The important flags to get right are:
    
    * On the pre-release, you should change ``-rc 1`` to ``-final``. On RC2,
      change it to ``-rc 2`` and so on.
    
    * On non-release testing, you can use ``-final`` in conjunction with
      ``-no-checkout``, but you'll have to create the ``final`` directory by hand
      and link the correct source dir to ``final/llvm.src``.
    
    * For release candidates, you need ``-test-asserts``, or it won't create a
      "Release+Asserts" directory, which is needed for release testing and
      benchmarking. This will take twice as long.
    
    * On the final candidate you just need Release builds, and that's the binary
      directory you'll have to pack.
    
    This script builds three phases of Clang+LLVM twice each (Release and
    Release+Asserts), so use screen or nohup to avoid headaches, since it'll take
    a long time.
    
    Use the ``--help`` option to see all the options and chose it according to
    your needs.
    
    
    findRegressions-nightly.py
    --------------------------
    
    TODO
    
    .. _test-suite:
    
    Test Suite
    ==========
    
    .. contents::
       :local:
    
    Follow the `LNT Quick Start Guide
    <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html>`__ link on how to set-up the
    test-suite
    
    The binary location you'll have to use for testing is inside the
    ``rcN/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-REL-RC.install``.
    Link that directory to an easier location and run the test-suite.
    
    An example on the run command line, assuming you created a link from the correct
    install directory to ``~/devel/llvm/install``::
    
       ./sandbox/bin/python sandbox/bin/lnt runtest \
           nt \
           -j4 \
           --sandbox sandbox \
           --test-suite ~/devel/llvm/test/test-suite \
           --cc ~/devel/llvm/install/bin/clang \
           --cxx ~/devel/llvm/install/bin/clang++
    
    It should have no new regressions, compared to the previous release or release
    candidate. You don't need to fix all the bugs in the test-suite, since they're
    not necessarily meant to pass on all architectures all the time. This is
    due to the nature of the result checking, which relies on direct comparison,
    and most of the time, the failures are related to bad output checking, rather
    than bad code generation.
    
    If the errors are in LLVM itself, please report every single regression found
    as blocker, and all the other bugs as important, but not necessarily blocking
    the release to proceed. They can be set as "known failures" and to be
    fix on a future date.
    
    .. _pre-release-process:
    
    Pre-Release Process
    ===================
    
    .. contents::
       :local:
    
    When the release process is announced on the mailing list, you should prepare
    for the testing, by applying the same testing you'll do on the release
    candidates, on the previous release.
    
    You should:
    
    * Download the previous release sources from
      http://llvm.org/releases/download.html.
    
    * Run the test-release.sh script on ``final`` mode (change ``-rc 1`` to
      ``-final``).
    
    * Once all three stages are done, it'll test the final stage.
    
    * Using the ``Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-MAJ.MIN-final.install`` base,
      run the test-suite.
    
    If the final phase's ``make check-all`` failed, it's a good idea to also test
    the intermediate stages by going on the obj directory and running
    ``make check-all`` to find if there's at least one stage that passes (helps
    when reducing the error for bug report purposes).
    
    .. _release-process:
    
    Release Process
    ===============
    
    .. contents::
       :local:
    
    When the Release Manager sends you the release candidate, download all sources,
    unzip on the same directory (there will be sym-links from the appropriate places
    to them), and run the release test as above.
    
    You should:
    
    * Download the current candidate sources from where the release manager points
      you (ex. http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc1/).
    
    * Repeat the steps above with ``-rc 1``, ``-rc 2`` etc modes and run the
      test-suite the same way.
    
    * Compare the results, report all errors on Bugzilla and publish the binary blob
      where the release manager can grab it.
    
    Once the release manages announces that the latest candidate is the good one,
    you have to pack the ``Release`` (no Asserts) install directory on ``Phase3``
    and that will be the official binary.
    
    * Rename (or link) ``clang+llvm-REL-ARCH-ENV`` to the .install directory
    
    * Tar that into the same name with ``.tar.gz`` extensioan from outside the
      directory
    
    * Make it available for the release manager to download
    
    .. _bug-reporting:
    
    Bug Reporting Process
    =====================
    
    .. contents::
       :local:
    
    If you found regressions or failures when comparing a release candidate with the
    previous release, follow the rules below:
    
    * Critical bugs on compilation should be fixed as soon as possible, possibly
      before releasing the binary blobs.
    
    * Check-all tests should be fixed before the next release candidate, but can
      wait until the test-suite run is finished.
    
    * Bugs in the test suite or unimportant check-all tests can be fixed in between
      release candidates.
    
    * New features or recent big changes, when close to the release, should have
      done in a way that it's easy to disable. If they misbehave, prefer disabling
      them than releasing an unstable (but untested) binary package.