Edit

IABSD.fr/xenocara/xserver/SECURITY.md

Branch :

  • Show log

    Commit

  • Author : matthieu
    Date : 2026-05-08 17:28:15
    Hash : e226f01b
    Message : Add missed file in update to 21.1.22

  • xserver/SECURITY.md
  • # Reporting Security Issues
    
    Please notify us of any security issues by sending mail to
    <xorg-security@lists.x.org>.
    
    See https://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Security/Organization/
    for more information about the X.Org security team.
    
    # Learning about Security Fixes
    
    X.Org announces security bugs and bug fix releases on the xorg-announce
    mailing list.  See the archives at https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/
    and see https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-announce to subscribe.
    
    Security advisories are also listed on our wiki at
    https://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Security/ and mailed to the
    https://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/oss-security mailing list.
    
    # Security model and trust boundaries
    
    Only the Xorg server is expected to run with elevated privileges.
    (Some distros may run Xorg with a wrapper to only grant these privileges when
    necessary.)  The Xorg server usually requires root access to hardware devices
    and I/O registers when using a UMS (Userspace Mode Setting) driver, and not
    when using a KMS (Kernel Mode Setting) driver, or drivers which do not require
    actual hardware access (such as xf86-video-dummy).
    
    All other X servers (Xephyr, Xnest, Xvfb, etc.) are expected to run with only
    the privileges of the user who started the server.  They should not require
    direct access to any devices.
    
    The Xorg server uses configuration files to control various aspects of its
    operation (see the xorg.conf(5) man page), including specifying loadable
    object modules to run code from with the full privileges of the X server.
    There is no attempt to sandbox these modules - they are considered to be fully
    trusted, and thus anyone who can edit a config file is considered to be fully
    trusted - a module being able to control or crash the X server is not considered
    a security vulnerability (though a crash would be a non-security bug in the
    module).  The configuration file loading mechanism takes steps to verify that
    config files are owned by trusted users before reading them, and failure to do
    so would be considered a security vulnerability.
    
    Access control for which clients can connect to the X server is provided by
    a number of mechanisms, see the Xsecurity(7) man page for details.  Once a
    client is authenticated via those mechanisms and has an active connection,
    we do not consider it a security vulnerability for them to be able to take
    any actions described in the X11 protocol or extension specifications, such
    as changing monitor configurations or killing other clients, though we will
    accept non-security bug reports for clients doing so in a manner or via
    requests not documented in the protocol specs as doing those operations.