Edit

IABSD.fr/xenocara/lib/pixman/README

Branch :

  • Show log

    Commit

  • Author : matthieu
    Date : 2013-06-07 17:18:00
    Hash : a9e7c8ad
    Message : Update to pixman 0.30.0. Tested by several people during t2k13. Thanks.

  • lib/pixman/README
  • Pixman is a library that provides low-level pixel manipulation
    features such as image compositing and trapezoid rasterization.
    
    Questions, bug reports and patches should be directed to the pixman
    mailing list:
    
            http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
    
    You can also file bugs at
    
            https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=pixman
    
    For real time discussions about pixman, feel free to join the IRC
    channels #cairo and #xorg-devel on the FreeNode IRC network.
    
    
    Contributing
    ------------
    
    In order to contribute to pixman, you will need a working knowledge of
    the git version control system. For a quick getting started guide,
    there is the "Everyday Git With 20 Commands Or So guide"
    
            http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/everyday.html
    
    from the Git homepage. For more in depth git documentation, see the
    resources on the Git community documentation page:
    
            http://git-scm.com/documentation
    
    Pixman uses the infrastructure from the freedesktop.org umbrella
    project. For instructions about how to use the git service on
    freedesktop.org, see:
    
            http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/Developers
    
    The Pixman master repository can be found at:
    
    	git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/pixman
    
    and browsed on the web here:
    
    	http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pixman/
    
    
    Sending patches
    ---------------
    
    The general workflow for sending patches is to first make sure that
    git can send mail on your system. Then, 
    
     - create a branch off of master in your local git repository
    
     - make your changes as one or more commits
    
     - use the 
    
            git send-email
    
       command to send the patch series to pixman@lists.freedesktop.org.
    
    In order for your patches to be accepted, please consider the
    following guidelines:
    
     - This link:
    
            http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#patch-series
    
       describes how what a good patch series is, and to create one with
       git.
    
     - At each point in the series, pixman should compile and the test
       suite should pass.
    
       The exception here is if you are changing the test suite to
       demonstrate a bug. In this case, make one commit that makes the
       test suite fail due to the bug, and then another commit that fixes
       the bug.
    
       You can run the test suite with 
    
            make check
    
       It will take around two minutes to run on a modern PC.
    
     - Follow the coding style described in the CODING_STYLE file
    
     - For bug fixes, include an update to the test suite to make sure
       the bug doesn't reappear.
    
     - For new features, add tests of the feature to the test
       suite. Also, add a program demonstrating the new feature to the
       demos/ directory.
    
     - Write descriptive commit messages. Useful information to include:
            - Benchmark results, before and after
    	- Description of the bug that was fixed
    	- Detailed rationale for any new API
    	- Alternative approaches that were rejected (and why they
              don't work)
    	- If review comments were incorporated, a brief version
              history describing what those changes were.
    
     - For big patch series, send an introductory email with an overall
       description of the patch series, including benchmarks and
       motivation. Each commit message should still be descriptive and
       include enough information to understand why this particular commit
       was necessary.
    
    Pixman has high standards for code quality and so almost everybody
    should expect to have the first versions of their patches rejected.
    
    If you think that the reviewers are wrong about something, or that the
    guidelines above are wrong, feel free to discuss the issue on the
    list. The purpose of the guidelines and code review is to ensure high
    code quality; it is not an exercise in compliance.