|
c755cb3e
|
2010-04-22T00:11:43
|
|
Change header comment
|
|
314905d7
|
2009-12-20T14:50:42
|
|
Explicitly track whether the buffer has positions
|
|
ff44f88d
|
2009-11-06T19:48:16
|
|
Handle shaping in non-native direction
|
|
25e7ef70
|
2009-11-06T17:21:01
|
|
Add _hb_buffer_add_output_glyphs() that takes codepoint_t*
|
|
9db8ad75
|
2009-11-06T16:47:31
|
|
Add hb_ot_layout_position_finish()
We expect buffer to be setup with default positions before GPOS.
|
|
9bef3611
|
2009-11-05T12:20:11
|
|
Rename [xy]_pos to [xy]_offset since we don't accumulate positions
|
|
2f50d873
|
2009-11-04T21:07:03
|
|
Start filling hb_shape() in
|
|
ae070b7d
|
2009-11-04T20:29:54
|
|
Add script and language to buffer
|
|
5ebabece
|
2009-11-03T15:15:07
|
|
Move unicode_funcs to buffer
|
|
864e2560
|
2009-08-18T16:38:48
|
|
[HB] Fix pedantic warnings
|
|
12eae6d5
|
2009-08-13T05:20:46
|
|
[HB] Fix buffer sizing issue with mingw gcc
Bit field packing is a delicate field. Issue reported in comment 3 here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591511
|
|
a5795845
|
2009-08-12T19:23:16
|
|
[HB] Add comment
|
|
e4679d9f
|
2009-08-12T16:47:27
|
|
[HB] Fix _hb_buffer_next() when positioning
We were copying glyphs to output. This should not happen when in
GPOS. Back then it was fine, then some optimizations broke then
assumption.
|
|
cbe5a4e0
|
2009-08-10T20:24:49
|
|
[HB] Reuse the positions array as alt string array
|
|
468769b8
|
2009-08-08T16:53:23
|
|
[HB] Rename hb_ot_layout_feature_mask_t to hb_mask_t
|
|
f1322e52
|
2009-08-01T22:53:04
|
|
[HB] Cleanup public buffer structs
|
|
11fbb548
|
2009-08-01T22:19:06
|
|
[HB] Port buffert to new object API
|
|
c968fc2d
|
2009-05-25T04:04:24
|
|
[HB] More buffer cleanup
|
|
88a5f5a4
|
2009-05-25T03:39:11
|
|
[HB] Cleanup buffer
|
|
6c78683c
|
2009-05-25T03:22:19
|
|
[HB] Update copyright years
|
|
f96ffd43
|
2009-05-24T15:01:16
|
|
[HB] simplify macros
|
|
5c0adce1
|
2009-05-20T05:42:12
|
|
[HB] Rename harfbuzz-buffer to hb-buffer
|
|
3015c417
|
2009-05-20T06:01:16
|
|
[HB] Remove last dependence on the old code base!
|