Author :
Ran Benita
Date :
2012-08-08 19:53:55
Hash :fafc1132 Message :types: get rid of PreserveInfo
We don't need the indirection. We store the preserve mask directly in
the entry, and create a new one if it doesn't exists (which is exactly
what the current code does in a roundabout way).
Incidentally this fixes a bug where the effective modifier mask of the
entries' preserve[] wasn't calculated, so the virtual modifiers had no
effect there.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Ran Benita