Hash :
23598fa1
Author :
Date :
2025-03-25T22:52:06
Enable merge mode “replace” in include statements Previously only the merge modes “override” and “augment” were available in include statements, using the prefix ‘+’ and ‘|’ respectively. While on one hand `replace` include statement can be used in keymap files, on the other hand *rules* files have no way to express the *replace* mode. This commit enables the merge mode “replace” using the prefix `^`. This prefix was chosen due to its similarity with the `XOR` bit operator, which convey *mutual exclusion*. Other candidates: - `!` conveys some kind of higher precedence, akin to CSS `!important`. But it conflicts with the section header `!`, which is a token in the current parser. It would require special handling, not worth it. It also convey the meaning of negation, which is confusing. - `&` has the advantage of not corresponding to a token in the rules parser. `^` seems however to stand out more and it is less likely to trigger erroneous comparison with `|` and `&` bit operators.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530
/*
* Copyright © 2012 Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
*/
#include "config.h"
#include "xkbcommon/xkbcommon.h"
#include "utils.h"
#include "test.h"
#include "xkbcomp/rules.h"
struct test_data {
/* Rules file */
const char *rules;
/* Input */
const char *model;
const char *layout;
const char *variant;
const char *options;
/* Expected output */
const char *keycodes;
const char *types;
const char *compat;
const char *symbols;
const char *geometry;
xkb_layout_index_t explicit_layouts;
/* Or set this if xkb_components_from_rules() should fail. */
bool should_fail;
};
static bool
test_rules(struct xkb_context *ctx, struct test_data *data)
{
fprintf(stderr, "\n\nChecking : %s\t%s\t%s\t%s\t%s\n", data->rules,
data->model, data->layout, data->variant, data->options);
if (data->should_fail)
fprintf(stderr, "Expecting: FAILURE\n");
else
fprintf(stderr, "Expecting: %s\t%s\t%s\t%s\t%s\t%u\n",
data->keycodes, data->types, data->compat, data->symbols,
data->geometry, data->explicit_layouts);
bool passed = true;
xkb_layout_index_t explicit_layouts;
for (int k = 0; k < 2; k++) {
bool ok;
const struct xkb_rule_names rmlvo = {
data->rules, data->model, data->layout, data->variant, data->options
};
struct xkb_component_names kccgst;
if (k == 0) {
/* Private API */
ok = xkb_components_from_rules(ctx, &rmlvo, &kccgst,
&explicit_layouts);
} else {
/* Public API */
ok = xkb_components_names_from_rules(ctx, &rmlvo, NULL, &kccgst);
}
if (ok) {
fprintf(stderr, "Received : %s\t%s\t%s\t%s\t%s\t%u\n",
kccgst.keycodes, kccgst.types, kccgst.compatibility,
kccgst.symbols, kccgst.geometry, explicit_layouts);
} else {
fprintf(stderr, "Received : FAILURE\n");
return data->should_fail;
}
passed &= streq_not_null(kccgst.keycodes, data->keycodes) &&
streq_not_null(kccgst.types, data->types) &&
streq_not_null(kccgst.compatibility, data->compat) &&
streq_not_null(kccgst.symbols, data->symbols) &&
streq_null(kccgst.geometry, data->geometry) &&
explicit_layouts == data->explicit_layouts;
free(kccgst.keycodes);
free(kccgst.types);
free(kccgst.compatibility);
free(kccgst.symbols);
free(kccgst.geometry);
}
return passed;
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct xkb_context *ctx;
test_init();
ctx = test_get_context(0);
assert(ctx);
struct test_data test_utf_8_with_bom = {
.rules = "utf-8_with_bom",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "my_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat|some:compat",
.symbols = "my_symbols+extra_variant",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test_utf_8_with_bom));
struct test_data test_utf_16le_with_bom = {
.rules = "utf-16le_with_bom",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "my_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat|some:compat",
.symbols = "my_symbols+extra_variant",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(!test_rules(ctx, &test_utf_16le_with_bom));
struct test_data test_utf_16be_with_bom = {
.rules = "utf-16be_with_bom",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "my_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat|some:compat",
.symbols = "my_symbols+extra_variant",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(!test_rules(ctx, &test_utf_16be_with_bom));
struct test_data test_utf_32be = {
.rules = "utf-32be",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "my_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat|some:compat",
.symbols = "my_symbols+extra_variant",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(!test_rules(ctx, &test_utf_32be));
struct test_data test1 = {
.rules = "simple",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "my_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat|some:compat",
.symbols = "my_symbols+extra_variant",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test1));
struct test_data test2 = {
.rules = "simple",
.model = "", .layout = "foo", .variant = "", .options = "",
.keycodes = "default_keycodes", .types = "default_types",
.compat = "default_compat", .symbols = "default_symbols",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test2));
struct test_data test3 = {
.rules = "groups",
.model = "pc104", .layout = "foo", .variant = "", .options = "",
.keycodes = "something(pc104)", .types = "default_types",
.compat = "default_compat", .symbols = "default_symbols",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test3));
struct test_data test4 = {
.rules = "groups",
.model = "foo", .layout = "ar", .variant = "bar", .options = "",
.keycodes = "default_keycodes", .types = "default_types",
.compat = "default_compat", .symbols = "my_symbols+(bar)",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test4));
struct test_data test5 = {
.rules = "simple",
.model = NULL, .layout = "my_layout,second_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "my_option",
.should_fail = true
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test5));
struct test_data test6 = {
.rules = "index",
.model = "", .layout = "br,al,cn,az", .variant = "",
.options = "some:opt",
.keycodes = "default_keycodes", .types = "default_types",
.compat = "default_compat",
.symbols = "default_symbols+extra:1+extra:2+extra:3+extra:4",
.explicit_layouts = 4,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test6));
struct test_data test7 = {
.rules = "multiple-options",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "my_layout", .variant = "my_variant",
.options = "option3,option1,colon:opt,option11",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat+some:compat+group(bla)",
.symbols = "my_symbols+extra_variant+compose(foo)+keypad(bar)+altwin(menu)",
.explicit_layouts = 1,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test7));
struct test_data test_merge_mode_replace = {
.rules = "merge-mode-replace",
.model = "my_model", .layout = "us,de", .variant = "",
.options = "replace:first",
.keycodes = "evdev", .types = "complete",
.compat = "complete",
.symbols = "pc+us+de:2^level3(ralt_alt)|empty",
.explicit_layouts = 2,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &test_merge_mode_replace));
/* Wild card does not match empty entries for layouts and variants */
#define ENTRY(_model, _layout, _variant, _options, _symbols, _layouts, _fail) \
{ .rules = "wildcard", .model = (_model), \
.layout = (_layout), .variant = (_variant), .options = (_options), \
.keycodes = "evdev", .types = "complete", .compat = "complete", \
.symbols = (_symbols) , .geometry = "pc(pc104)", \
.explicit_layouts = (_layouts), .should_fail = (_fail) }
struct test_data wildcard_data[] = {
/* OK: empty model and options and at least one layout+variant combo */
ENTRY(NULL, "a" , "1" , NULL, "pc+a(1)", 1, false),
ENTRY("" , "a" , "1" , "" , "pc+a(1)", 1, false),
ENTRY("" , "a," , "1," , "" , "pc+a(1)", 1, false),
ENTRY("" , ",b" , ",2" , "" , "+b(2):2", 2, false),
ENTRY("" , "a,b", "1," , "" , "pc+a(1)", 1, false),
ENTRY("" , "a,b", ",2" , "" , "+b(2):2", 2, false),
/* Fails: empty layout or variant */
ENTRY(NULL, NULL , NULL , NULL, "", 1, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "" , "" , NULL, "", 1, true),
ENTRY(NULL, NULL , "1" , NULL, "", 1, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "" , "1" , NULL, "", 1, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "," , "1,2", NULL, "", 2, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "a" , NULL , NULL, "", 1, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "a" , "" , NULL, "", 1, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "a,b", NULL , NULL, "", 2, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "a,b", "" , NULL, "", 2, true),
ENTRY(NULL, "a,b", "," , NULL, "", 2, true)
};
#undef ENTRY
for (size_t k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(wildcard_data); k++) {
assert(test_rules(ctx, &wildcard_data[k]));
}
/* Prepare data with too much layouts */
char too_much_layouts[(2 + MAX_LAYOUT_INDEX_STR_LENGTH) * (XKB_MAX_GROUPS + 1)] = { 0 };
char too_much_symbols[(3 + MAX_LAYOUT_INDEX_STR_LENGTH) * XKB_MAX_GROUPS] = { 0 };
size_t i = 0;
for (xkb_layout_index_t l = 0; l <= XKB_MAX_GROUPS; l++) {
i += snprintf(&too_much_layouts[i], sizeof(too_much_layouts) - i,
"x%"PRIu32",", l + 1);
}
too_much_layouts[--i] = '\0';
i = 0;
for (xkb_layout_index_t l = 0; l < XKB_MAX_GROUPS; l++) {
i += snprintf(&too_much_symbols[i], sizeof(too_much_symbols) - i,
"x:%"PRIu32"+", l + 1);
}
too_much_symbols[--i] = '\0';
#define ENTRY2(_rules, _model, _layout, _variant, _options, \
_keycodes, _types, _compat, _symbols, _count, _should_fail) \
{ .rules = (_rules), .model = (_model), \
.layout = (_layout), .variant = (_variant), .options = (_options), \
.keycodes = (_keycodes), .types = (_types), .compat = (_compat), \
.symbols = (_symbols), \
.geometry = (strncmp((_rules), "evdev", 5) == 0) ? "pc(pc104)" : NULL,\
.explicit_layouts = (_count), .should_fail = (_should_fail) }
#define ENTRY(layout, variant, options, symbols, count, should_fail) \
ENTRY2("special_indexes", NULL, layout, variant, options, \
"default_keycodes", "default_types", "default_compat", symbols, \
count, should_fail)
struct test_data special_indexes_first_data[] = {
/* Test index ranges: layout vs layout[first] */
ENTRY("layout_a", NULL, NULL, "symbols_A", 1, false),
ENTRY("layout_e", NULL, NULL, "symbols_E+layout_e", 1, false),
ENTRY("a", NULL, NULL, "a", 1, false),
ENTRY("a", "1", NULL, "a(1)", 1, false),
/* Test index ranges: invalid layout qualifier */
ENTRY("layout_c", NULL, NULL, "symbols_C:1+symbols_z:1", 1, false),
/* Test index ranges: invalid layout[first] qualifier */
ENTRY("layout_d", NULL, NULL, "symbols_D", 1, false),
/* Test index ranges: multiple layouts */
ENTRY("a,b", NULL, NULL, "a+b:2", 2, false),
ENTRY("a,b", ",c", NULL, "a+b(c):2", 2, false),
ENTRY("layout_e,layout_a", NULL, NULL, "symbols_e:1+symbols_x:2", 2, false),
ENTRY("layout_a,layout_b,layout_c,layout_d", NULL, NULL,
"symbols_a:1+symbols_y:2+layout_c:3+layout_d:4+symbols_z:3", 4, false),
ENTRY("layout_a,layout_b,layout_c,layout_d",
"extra,,,extra", NULL,
"symbols_a:1+symbols_y:2+layout_c:3+layout_d(extra):4+symbols_z:3"
"+foo:1|bar:1+foo:4|bar:4", 4, false),
/* NOTE: 5 layouts is intentional;
* will require update when raising XKB_MAX_LAYOUTS */
ENTRY("layout_a,layout_b,layout_c,layout_d,layout_e", NULL, NULL,
"symbols_a:1+symbols_y:2+layout_c:3+layout_d:4+symbols_z:3", 4, false),
#undef ENTRY
/* Test index ranges: too much layouts */
ENTRY2("special_indexes-limit", NULL, too_much_layouts, NULL, NULL,
"default_keycodes", "default_types", "default_compat", too_much_symbols,
XKB_MAX_GROUPS, false),
#define ENTRY(model, layout, variant, options, compat, symbols, count, should_fail) \
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", model, layout, variant, options, \
"evdev+aliases(qwerty)", "complete", compat, symbols, count, should_fail)
/* evdev-modern: 1 layout */
ENTRY("whatever", "ar", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+ara+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("whatever", "ben", "probhat", NULL, "complete", "pc+in(ben_probhat)+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("ataritt", "es", NULL, NULL, "complete", "xfree68_vndr/ataritt(us)+es+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("ataritt", "jp", NULL, NULL, "complete+japan", "xfree68_vndr/ataritt(us)+jp+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", "olpc", "us", NULL, NULL,
"evdev+olpc(olpc)+aliases(qwerty)", "complete", "olpc", "olpc+us(olpc)+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", "olpc", "jp", NULL, NULL,
"evdev+olpc(olpc)+aliases(qwerty)", "complete", "complete+japan", "olpc+jp+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "jp", NULL, NULL, "complete+japan", "pc+jp+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "jp", "xxx", NULL, "complete+japan", "pc+jp(xxx)+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "es", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+es+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "es", "xxx", NULL, "complete", "pc+es(xxx)+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", "pc104", "de", "neo", NULL,
"evdev+aliases(qwertz)", "complete",
"complete+caps(caps_lock):1+misc(assign_shift_left_action):1+level5(level5_lock):1",
"pc+de(neo)+inet(evdev)", 1, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "br", NULL, "misc:typo,misc:apl", "complete",
"pc+br+inet(evdev)+apl(level3):1+typo(base):1", 1, false),
/* evdev-modern: 2 layouts */
ENTRY("whatever", "ar,pt", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+ara+pt:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("whatever", "pt,ar", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+pt+ara:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("whatever", "ben,gb", "probhat,", NULL, "complete",
"pc+in(ben_probhat)+gb:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("whatever", "gb,ben", ",probhat", NULL, "complete",
"pc+gb+in(ben):2+in(ben_probhat):2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("whatever", "ben,ar", "probhat,", NULL, "complete",
"pc+in(ben_probhat)+ara:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("ataritt", "jp,es", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+jp+es:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("ataritt", "es,jp", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+es+jp:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", "olpc", "jp,es", NULL, NULL,
"evdev+olpc(olpc)+aliases(qwerty)", "complete", "complete", "pc+jp+es:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", "olpc", "es,jp", NULL, NULL,
"evdev+olpc(olpc)+aliases(qwerty)", "complete", "complete", "pc+es+jp:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "jp,es", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+jp+es:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "jp,es", "xxx,yyy", NULL, "complete", "pc+jp(xxx)+es(yyy):2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "latin,jp", NULL, NULL, "complete", "pc+latin+jp:2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "latin,jp", "xxx,yyy", NULL, "complete", "pc+latin(xxx)+jp(yyy):2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY2("evdev-modern", "pc104", "gb,de", ",neo", NULL,
"evdev+aliases(qwerty)", "complete",
"complete+caps(caps_lock):2+misc(assign_shift_left_action):2+level5(level5_lock):2",
"pc+gb+de(neo):2+inet(evdev)", 2, false),
ENTRY("pc104", "ca,br", NULL, "misc:typo,misc:apl", "complete",
"pc+ca+br:2+inet(evdev)+apl(level3):1+apl(level3):2+typo(base):1+typo(base):2", 2, false),
#undef ENTRY
};
for (size_t k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(special_indexes_first_data); k++) {
assert(test_rules(ctx, &special_indexes_first_data[k]));
}
/* Test extended wild cards: <none>, <some> and <any> */
#define ENTRY(_rules, _layout, _variant, _symbols, _layouts, _fail) \
{ .rules = (_rules), .model = NULL, \
.layout = (_layout), .variant = (_variant), .options = NULL, \
.keycodes = "evdev", .types = "complete", .compat = "complete", \
.symbols = (_symbols) , .explicit_layouts = (_layouts), \
.should_fail = (_fail) }
struct test_data extended_wild_cards_data[] = {
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l1", NULL, "pc+l10:1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l1", "v1", "pc+l20:1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l1", "v2", "pc+l30(v2):1", 1, false),
/* legacy wild card * does not catch empty variant */
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l2", NULL, "pc+l2:1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l2", "v1", "pc+l40(v1):1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l2", "v2", "pc+l40(v2):1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l3", NULL, "pc+l50:1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l3", "v1", "pc+l50(v1):1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l3", "v2", "pc+l50(v2):1", 1, false),
/* ? wild card does catch empty variant */
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l4", NULL, "pc+l4:1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l4", "v1", "pc+l4(v1):1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l4", "v2", "pc+l4(v20):1", 1, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l1,l1,l1,l2", ",v1,v2,",
"pc+l10:1+l20:2+l30(v2):3+l2:4", 4, false),
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l2,l2,l3,l3", "v1,v2,,v1",
"pc+l40(v1):1+l40(v2):2+l50:3+l50(v1):4", 4, false),
/* NOTE: `l4(v2)` (4th LV index) is matched *before* the other LV indexes,
* because with the extended indexes we follow the order of the rules in the
* file, not the RMLVO order. This is similar to options handling. */
ENTRY("extended-wild-cards", "l3,l4,l4,l4", "v2,,v1,v2",
"pc+l50(v2):1+l4(v20):4+l4:2+l4(v1):3", 4, false),
};
for (size_t k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(extended_wild_cards_data); k++) {
assert(test_rules(ctx, &extended_wild_cards_data[k]));
}
#undef ENTRY
/* Test :all qualifier without special indexes, with option */
struct test_data all_qualified_alone1 = {
.rules = "all_qualifier",
.model = "my_model",
/* NOTE: 5 layouts is intentional;
* will require update when raising XKB_MAX_LAYOUTS */
.layout = "layout_a,layout_b,layout_a,layout_b,layout_c",
.variant = "",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat",
.symbols = "symbols_a:1+symbols_b:2+symbols_a:3+symbols_b:4+extra_option:1"
"+extra_option:2+extra_option:3+extra_option:4",
.explicit_layouts = 4,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &all_qualified_alone1));
/* Test :all qualifier without special indexes, base for all layout */
struct test_data all_qualified_alone2 = {
.rules = "all_qualifier",
.model = "my_model",
/* NOTE: 5 layouts is intentional;
* will require update when raising XKB_MAX_LAYOUTS */
.layout = "layout_x,layout_a,layout_b,layout_c,layout_d",
.variant = "",
.options = "",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat",
.symbols = "base:1+base:2+base:3+base:4"
"+symbols_a:2+symbols_b:3+default_symbols:4",
.explicit_layouts = 4,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &all_qualified_alone2));
/* Test :all qualifier without special indexes, with option, too much layouts */
struct test_data all_qualified_invalid_layouts = {
.rules = "all_qualifier-limit",
.model = "my_model",
.layout = too_much_layouts,
.variant = "",
.options = "",
.keycodes = "default_keycodes", .types = "default_types",
.compat = "default_compat",
.symbols = too_much_symbols,
.explicit_layouts = XKB_MAX_GROUPS,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &all_qualified_invalid_layouts));
/* Test :all qualifier with special indexes */
struct test_data all_qualified_with_special_indexes1 = {
.rules = "all_qualifier",
.model = "my_model",
/* NOTE: 5 layouts is intentional;
* will require update when raising XKB_MAX_LAYOUTS */
.layout = "layout_a,layout_b,layout_a,layout_b,layout_c",
.variant = "extra1,,,,",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat",
.symbols = "symbols_a:1+symbols_b:2+symbols_a:3+symbols_b:4"
"+extra_symbols:1+extra_symbols:2+extra_symbols:3+extra_symbols:4"
"+extra_option:1+extra_option:2+extra_option:3+extra_option:4",
.explicit_layouts = 4,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &all_qualified_with_special_indexes1));
/* Test :all qualifier with special indexes
* It uses :all combined with layout[any], which is valid but
* :%i was probably the intended qualified, so raises warning */
struct test_data all_qualified_with_special_indexes2 = {
.rules = "all_qualifier",
.model = "my_model",
/* NOTE: 5 layouts is intentional;
* will require update when raising XKB_MAX_LAYOUTS */
.layout = "layout_a,layout_b,layout_a,layout_b,layout_c",
.variant = "extra2,,extra3,,",
.options = "my_option",
.keycodes = "my_keycodes", .types = "my_types",
.compat = "my_compat",
.symbols = "symbols_a:1+symbols_b:2+symbols_a:3+symbols_b:4"
"+extra_symbols1:1+extra_symbols2:1+extra_symbols2:2+extra_symbols2:3+extra_symbols2:4"
"+extra_symbols2:1+extra_symbols2:2+extra_symbols2:3+extra_symbols2:4"
"+extra_symbols1:3"
"+extra_option:1"
"+extra_option:2+extra_option:3+extra_option:4",
.explicit_layouts = 4,
};
assert(test_rules(ctx, &all_qualified_with_special_indexes2));
xkb_context_unref(ctx);
return 0;
}