kmx git

Commit	Date	Message
185b0d08	2018-01-20T19:41:28	merge: recursive uses larger conflict markers Git uses longer conflict markers in the recursive merge base - two more than the default (thus, 9 character long conflict markers). This allows users to tell the difference between the recursive merge conflicts and conflicts between the ours and theirs branches. This was introduced in git d694a17986a28bbc19e2a6c32404ca24572e400f. Update our tests to expect this as well.
78859c63	2015-11-20T17:33:49	merge: handle conflicts in recursive base building When building a recursive merge base, allow conflicts to occur. Use the file (with conflict markers) as the common ancestor. The user has already seen and dealt with this conflict by virtue of having a criss-cross merge. If they resolved this conflict identically in both branches, then there will be no conflict in the result. This is the best case scenario. If they did not resolve the conflict identically in the two branches, then we will generate a new conflict. If the user is simply using standard conflict output then the results will be fairly sensible. But if the user is using a mergetool or using diff3 output, then the common ancestor will be a conflict file (itself with diff3 output, haha!). This is quite terrible, but it matches git's behavior.
651bfd69	2015-11-09T08:24:47	recursive: test conflict output during recursive merge

185b0d08

2018-01-20T19:41:28

merge: recursive uses larger conflict markers Git uses longer conflict markers in the recursive merge base - two more than the default (thus, 9 character long conflict markers). This allows users to tell the difference between the recursive merge conflicts and conflicts between the ours and theirs branches. This was introduced in git d694a17986a28bbc19e2a6c32404ca24572e400f. Update our tests to expect this as well.

78859c63

2015-11-20T17:33:49

merge: handle conflicts in recursive base building When building a recursive merge base, allow conflicts to occur. Use the file (with conflict markers) as the common ancestor. The user has already seen and dealt with this conflict by virtue of having a criss-cross merge. If they resolved this conflict identically in both branches, then there will be no conflict in the result. This is the best case scenario. If they did not resolve the conflict identically in the two branches, then we will generate a new conflict. If the user is simply using standard conflict output then the results will be fairly sensible. But if the user is using a mergetool or using diff3 output, then the common ancestor will be a conflict file (itself with diff3 output, haha!). This is quite terrible, but it matches git's behavior.

651bfd69

2015-11-09T08:24:47

recursive: test conflict output during recursive merge

thodg/libgit2/tests/merge/workdir/recursive.c

tests/merge/workdir/recursive.c

Log