|
7a16d54b
|
2013-12-13T12:47:51
|
|
pool: Agh, this test doesn't really apply in 32-bit machines
The size_t is 32-bit already, so it overflows before going into the
function. The `-1` test should handle this gracefully in both cases
anyway.
|
|
|
437f7d69
|
2013-12-13T12:41:22
|
|
pool: Correct overflow checks
Ok, scrap the previous commit. This is the right overflow check that
takes care of 64 bit overflow **and** 32-bit overflow, which needs to be
considered because the pool malloc can only allocate 32-bit elements in
one go.
|
|
17820381
|
2013-11-14T14:05:52
|
|
Rename tests-clar to tests
|