Hash :
19f1a8e6
Author :
Date :
2016-09-05T11:44:51
diff: improve positioning of add/delete blocks in diffs Some groups of added/deleted lines in diffs can be slid up or down, because lines at the edges of the group are not unique. Picking good shifts for such groups is not a matter of correctness but definitely has a big effect on aesthetics. For example, consider the following two diffs. The first is what standard Git emits: --- a/9c572b21dd090a1e5c5bb397053bf8043ffe7fb4:git-send-email.perl +++ b/6dcfa306f2b67b733a7eb2d7ded1bc9987809edb:git-send-email.perl @@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ if (!defined $initial_reply_to && $prompting) { } if (!$smtp_server) { + $smtp_server = $repo->config('sendemail.smtpserver'); +} +if (!$smtp_server) { foreach (qw( /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail )) { if (-x $_) { $smtp_server = $_; The following diff is equivalent, but is obviously preferable from an aesthetic point of view: --- a/9c572b21dd090a1e5c5bb397053bf8043ffe7fb4:git-send-email.perl +++ b/6dcfa306f2b67b733a7eb2d7ded1bc9987809edb:git-send-email.perl @@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ if (!defined $initial_reply_to && $prompting) { $initial_reply_to =~ s/(^\s+|\s+$)//g; } +if (!$smtp_server) { + $smtp_server = $repo->config('sendemail.smtpserver'); +} if (!$smtp_server) { foreach (qw( /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail )) { if (-x $_) { This patch teaches Git to pick better positions for such "diff sliders" using heuristics that take the positions of nearby blank lines and the indentation of nearby lines into account. The existing Git code basically always shifts such "sliders" as far down in the file as possible. The only exception is when the slider can be aligned with a group of changed lines in the other file, in which case Git favors depicting the change as one add+delete block rather than one add and a slightly offset delete block. This naive algorithm often yields ugly diffs. Commit d634d61ed6 improved the situation somewhat by preferring to position add/delete groups to make their last line a blank line, when that is possible. This heuristic does more good than harm, but (1) it can only help if there are blank lines in the right places, and (2) always picks the last blank line, even if there are others that might be better. The end result is that it makes perhaps 1/3 as many errors as the default Git algorithm, but that still leaves a lot of ugly diffs. This commit implements a new and much better heuristic for picking optimal "slider" positions using the following approach: First observe that each hypothetical positioning of a diff slider introduces two splits: one between the context lines preceding the group and the first added/deleted line, and the other between the last added/deleted line and the first line of context following it. It tries to find the positioning that creates the least bad splits. Splits are evaluated based only on the presence and locations of nearby blank lines, and the indentation of lines near the split. Basically, it prefers to introduce splits adjacent to blank lines, between lines that are indented less, and between lines with the same level of indentation. In more detail: 1. It measures the following characteristics of a proposed splitting position in a `struct split_measurement`: * the number of blank lines above the proposed split * whether the line directly after the split is blank * the number of blank lines following that line * the indentation of the nearest non-blank line above the split * the indentation of the line directly below the split * the indentation of the nearest non-blank line after that line 2. It combines the measured attributes using a bunch of empirically-optimized weighting factors to derive a `struct split_score` that measures the "badness" of splitting the text at that position. 3. It combines the `split_score` for the top and the bottom of the slider at each of its possible positions, and selects the position that has the best `split_score`. I determined the initial set of weighting factors by collecting a corpus of Git histories from 29 open-source software projects in various programming languages. I generated many diffs from this corpus, and determined the best positioning "by eye" for about 6600 diff sliders. I used about half of the repositories in the corpus (corresponding to about 2/3 of the sliders) as a training set, and optimized the weights against this corpus using a crude automated search of the parameter space to get the best agreement with the manually-determined values. Then I tested the resulting heuristic against the full corpus. The results are summarized in the following table, in column `indent-1`: | repository | count | Git 2.9.0 | compaction | compaction-fixed | indent-1 | indent-2 | | --------------------- | ----- | -------------- | -------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -------------- | | afnetworking | 109 | 89 (81.7%) | 37 (33.9%) | 37 (33.9%) | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.8%) | | alamofire | 30 | 18 (60.0%) | 14 (46.7%) | 15 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | | angular | 184 | 127 (69.0%) | 39 (21.2%) | 23 (12.5%) | 5 (2.7%) | 5 (2.7%) | | animate | 313 | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | | ant | 380 | 356 (93.7%) | 152 (40.0%) | 148 (38.9%) | 15 (3.9%) | 15 (3.9%) | * | bugzilla | 306 | 263 (85.9%) | 109 (35.6%) | 99 (32.4%) | 14 (4.6%) | 15 (4.9%) | * | corefx | 126 | 91 (72.2%) | 22 (17.5%) | 21 (16.7%) | 6 (4.8%) | 6 (4.8%) | | couchdb | 78 | 44 (56.4%) | 26 (33.3%) | 28 (35.9%) | 6 (7.7%) | 6 (7.7%) | * | cpython | 937 | 158 (16.9%) | 50 (5.3%) | 49 (5.2%) | 5 (0.5%) | 5 (0.5%) | * | discourse | 160 | 95 (59.4%) | 42 (26.2%) | 36 (22.5%) | 18 (11.2%) | 13 (8.1%) | | docker | 307 | 194 (63.2%) | 198 (64.5%) | 253 (82.4%) | 8 (2.6%) | 8 (2.6%) | * | electron | 163 | 132 (81.0%) | 38 (23.3%) | 39 (23.9%) | 6 (3.7%) | 6 (3.7%) | | git | 536 | 470 (87.7%) | 73 (13.6%) | 78 (14.6%) | 16 (3.0%) | 16 (3.0%) | * | gitflow | 127 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | | ionic | 133 | 89 (66.9%) | 29 (21.8%) | 38 (28.6%) | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (0.8%) | | ipython | 482 | 362 (75.1%) | 167 (34.6%) | 169 (35.1%) | 11 (2.3%) | 11 (2.3%) | * | junit | 161 | 147 (91.3%) | 67 (41.6%) | 66 (41.0%) | 1 (0.6%) | 1 (0.6%) | * | lighttable | 15 | 5 (33.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | | magit | 88 | 75 (85.2%) | 11 (12.5%) | 9 (10.2%) | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | | neural-style | 28 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | | nodejs | 781 | 649 (83.1%) | 118 (15.1%) | 111 (14.2%) | 4 (0.5%) | 5 (0.6%) | * | phpmyadmin | 491 | 481 (98.0%) | 75 (15.3%) | 48 (9.8%) | 2 (0.4%) | 2 (0.4%) | * | react-native | 168 | 130 (77.4%) | 79 (47.0%) | 81 (48.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | | rust | 171 | 128 (74.9%) | 30 (17.5%) | 27 (15.8%) | 16 (9.4%) | 14 (8.2%) | | spark | 186 | 149 (80.1%) | 52 (28.0%) | 52 (28.0%) | 2 (1.1%) | 2 (1.1%) | | tensorflow | 115 | 66 (57.4%) | 48 (41.7%) | 48 (41.7%) | 5 (4.3%) | 5 (4.3%) | | test-more | 19 | 15 (78.9%) | 2 (10.5%) | 2 (10.5%) | 1 (5.3%) | 1 (5.3%) | * | test-unit | 51 | 34 (66.7%) | 14 (27.5%) | 8 (15.7%) | 2 (3.9%) | 2 (3.9%) | * | xmonad | 23 | 22 (95.7%) | 2 (8.7%) | 2 (8.7%) | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (4.3%) | * | --------------------- | ----- | -------------- | -------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -------------- | | totals | 6668 | 4391 (65.9%) | 1496 (22.4%) | 1491 (22.4%) | 150 (2.2%) | 144 (2.2%) | | totals (training set) | 4552 | 3195 (70.2%) | 1053 (23.1%) | 1061 (23.3%) | 86 (1.9%) | 88 (1.9%) | | totals (test set) | 2116 | 1196 (56.5%) | 443 (20.9%) | 430 (20.3%) | 64 (3.0%) | 56 (2.6%) | In this table, the numbers are the count and percentage of human-rated sliders that the corresponding algorithm got *wrong*. The columns are * "repository" - the name of the repository used. I used the diffs between successive non-merge commits on the HEAD branch of the corresponding repository. * "count" - the number of sliders that were human-rated. I chose most, but not all, sliders to rate from those among which the various algorithms gave different answers. * "Git 2.9.0" - the default algorithm used by `git diff` in Git 2.9.0. * "compaction" - the heuristic used by `git diff --compaction-heuristic` in Git 2.9.0. * "compaction-fixed" - the heuristic used by `git diff --compaction-heuristic` after the fixes from earlier in this patch series. Note that the results are not dramatically different than those for "compaction". Both produce non-ideal diffs only about 1/3 as often as the default `git diff`. * "indent-1" - the new `--indent-heuristic` algorithm, using the first set of weighting factors, determined as described above. * "indent-2" - the new `--indent-heuristic` algorithm, using the final set of weighting factors, determined as described below. * `*` - indicates that repo was part of training set used to determine the first set of weighting factors. The fact that the heuristic performed nearly as well on the test set as on the training set in column "indent-1" is a good indication that the heuristic was not over-trained. Given that fact, I ran a second round of optimization, using the entire corpus as the training set. The resulting set of weights gave the results in column "indent-2". These are the weights included in this patch. The final result gives consistently and significantly better results across the whole corpus than either `git diff` or `git diff --compaction-heuristic`. It makes only about 1/30 as many errors as the former and about 1/10 as many errors as the latter. (And a good fraction of the remaining errors are for diffs that involve weirdly-formatted code, sometimes apparently machine-generated.) The tools that were used to do this optimization and analysis, along with the human-generated data values, are recorded in a separate project [1]. [1] https://github.com/mhagger/diff-slider-tools Original Git commit: 433860f3d0beb0c6f205290bd16cda413148f098
Git HTTP | https://git.kmx.io/thodg/libgit2.git |
---|---|
Git SSH | git@git.kmx.io:thodg/libgit2.git |
Public access ? | public |
Description | |
Users |
![]() |
Tags |
|
libgit2
is a portable, pure C implementation of the Git core methods
provided as a re-entrant linkable library with a solid API, allowing you to
write native speed custom Git applications in any language with bindings.
libgit2
is licensed under a very permissive license (GPLv2 with a special
Linking Exception). This basically means that you can link it (unmodified)
with any kind of software without having to release its source code.
Additionally, the example code has been released to the public domain (see the
separate license for more information).
Join us on Slack
Visit slack.libgit2.org to sign up, then join
us in #libgit2
. If you prefer IRC, you can also point your client to our
slack channel once you’ve registered.
Getting Help
If you have questions about the library, please be sure to check out the
API documentation. If you still have
questions, reach out to us on Slack or post a question on
StackOverflow (with the libgit2
tag).
Reporting Bugs
Please open a GitHub Issue and include as much information as possible. If possible, provide sample code that illustrates the problem you’re seeing. If you’re seeing a bug only on a specific repository, please provide a link to it if possible.
We ask that you not open a GitHub Issue for help, only for bug reports.
libgit2
is already very usable and is being used in production for many
applications including the GitHub.com site, in Plastic SCM and also powering
Microsoft’s Visual Studio tools for Git. The library provides:
While the library provides git functionality without the need for dependencies, it can make use of a few libraries to add to it:
The library needs to keep track of some global state. Call
git_libgit2_init();
before calling any other libgit2 functions. You can call this function many times. A matching number of calls to
git_libgit2_shutdown();
will free the resources. Note that if you have worker threads, you should
call git_libgit2_shutdown
after those threads have exited. If you
require assistance coordinating this, simply have the worker threads call
git_libgit2_init
at startup and git_libgit2_shutdown
at shutdown.
See THREADING for information
See CONVENTIONS for an overview of the external and internal API/coding conventions we use.
libgit2
builds cleanly on most platforms without any external dependencies.
Under Unix-like systems, like Linux, *BSD and Mac OS X, libgit2 expects pthreads
to be available;
they should be installed by default on all systems. Under Windows, libgit2 uses the native Windows API
for threading.
The libgit2
library is built using CMake (version 2.8 or newer) on all platforms.
On most systems you can build the library using the following commands
$ mkdir build && cd build
$ cmake ..
$ cmake --build .
Alternatively you can point the CMake GUI tool to the CMakeLists.txt file and generate platform specific build project or IDE workspace.
To install the library you can specify the install prefix by setting:
$ cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/install/prefix
$ cmake --build . --target install
For more advanced use or questions about CMake please read https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ.
The following CMake variables are declared:
BIN_INSTALL_DIR
: Where to install binaries to. LIB_INSTALL_DIR
: Where to install libraries to. INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR
: Where to install headers to. BUILD_SHARED_LIBS
: Build libgit2 as a Shared Library (defaults to ON) BUILD_CLAR
: Build Clar-based test suite (defaults to ON) THREADSAFE
: Build libgit2 with threading support (defaults to ON) STDCALL
: Build libgit2 as stdcall
. Turn off for cdecl
(Windows; defaults to ON) CMake lets you specify a few variables to control the behavior of the compiler and linker. These flags are rarely used but can be useful for 64-bit to 32-bit cross-compilation.
CMAKE_C_FLAGS
: Set your own compiler flags CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH
: Override the search path for libraries ZLIB_LIBRARY
, OPENSSL_SSL_LIBRARY
AND OPENSSL_CRYPTO_LIBRARY
:
Tell CMake where to find those specific libraries
If you want to build a universal binary for Mac OS X, CMake sets it
all up for you if you use -DCMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURES="i386;x86_64"
when configuring.
You need to run the CMake commands from the Visual Studio command
prompt, not the regular or Windows SDK one. Select the right generator
for your version with the -G "Visual Studio X" option. See [the website](http://libgit2.github.com/docs/guides/build-and-link/) for more detailed instructions. Android ------- Extract toolchain from NDK using,
make-standalone-toolchain.shscript. Optionally, crosscompile and install OpenSSL inside of it. Then create CMake toolchain file that configures paths to your crosscompiler (substitute
{PATH}with full path to the toolchain): SET(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME Linux) SET(CMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION Android) SET(CMAKE_C_COMPILER {PATH}/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-gcc) SET(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER {PATH}/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-g++) SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH {PATH}/sysroot/) SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_PROGRAM NEVER) SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_LIBRARY ONLY) SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_INCLUDE ONLY) Add
-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE={pathToToolchainFile}to cmake command when configuring. Language Bindings ================================== Here are the bindings to libgit2 that are currently available: * C++ * libqgit2, Qt bindings <https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/libs/libqgit2/repository/> * Chicken Scheme * chicken-git <https://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/git> * D * dlibgit <https://github.com/s-ludwig/dlibgit> * Delphi * GitForDelphi <https://github.com/libgit2/GitForDelphi> * Erlang * Geef <https://github.com/carlosmn/geef> * Go * git2go <https://github.com/libgit2/git2go> * GObject * libgit2-glib <https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Libgit2-glib> * Haskell * hgit2 <https://github.com/jwiegley/gitlib> * Java * Jagged <https://github.com/ethomson/jagged> * Julia * LibGit2.jl <https://github.com/jakebolewski/LibGit2.jl> * Lua * luagit2 <https://github.com/libgit2/luagit2> * .NET * libgit2sharp <https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2sharp> * Node.js * nodegit <https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit> * Objective-C * objective-git <https://github.com/libgit2/objective-git> * OCaml * ocaml-libgit2 <https://github.com/fxfactorial/ocaml-libgit2> * Parrot Virtual Machine * parrot-libgit2 <https://github.com/letolabs/parrot-libgit2> * Perl * Git-Raw <https://github.com/jacquesg/p5-Git-Raw> * PHP * php-git <https://github.com/libgit2/php-git> * PowerShell * PSGit <https://github.com/PoshCode/PSGit> * Python * pygit2 <https://github.com/libgit2/pygit2> * R * git2r <https://github.com/ropensci/git2r> * Ruby * Rugged <https://github.com/libgit2/rugged> * Rust * git2-rs <https://github.com/alexcrichton/git2-rs> * Swift * Gift <https://github.com/modocache/Gift> * Vala * libgit2.vapi <https://github.com/apmasell/vapis/blob/master/libgit2.vapi> If you start another language binding to libgit2, please let us know so we can add it to the list. How Can I Contribute? ================================== We welcome new contributors! We have a number of issues marked as ["up for grabs"](https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22up+for+grabs%22) and ["easy fix"](https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22easy+fix%22) that are good places to jump in and get started. There's much more detailed information in our list of [outstanding projects](PROJECTS.md). Please be sure to check the [contribution guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) to understand our workflow, and the libgit2 [coding conventions](CONVENTIONS.md). License ==================================
libgit2` is under GPL2 with linking exception. This means you can link to
and use the library from any program, proprietary or open source; paid or
gratis. However, if you modify libgit2 itself, you must distribute the
source to your modified version of libgit2.
See the COPYING file for the full license text.